Exodus from 'Blue' States to 'Red' States

I've heard about this before; people are moving out of places like California to more conservative states in the USA. I understand that Texas is popular. The following article looks at this phenomenon, something the MSM seem loathe to acknowledge is happening at all. https://www.infowars.com/posts/red-states-fighting-back-against-globalist-reset-what-does-this-mean-for-the-future/

India and the COVID-19 Surge

We are being bombarded daily with how bad the COVID-19 epidemic is in India. Is this real or are we being softened up for further lockdowns? The following article looks at this and concludes we are being lied to: https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/04/25/indias-covid-crisis-has-been-hijacked-the-mainstream-media-are-lying-to-you/

Joe Biden: Simpleton

The Biden administration is out of its depth, they've released a statement on the Armenian genocide. You can read it here. 

Why is this a stupid thing to do? The Ottoman Empire was behind the atrocities. They have long since been discarded into the dustbin of history. The sick man of Europe lost the First World War and ceased to exist. 

What rose in its place were several states, amongst them modern day Turkey. Implicit in this Biden statement is an attack on Turkey which took no part in the events described. Took no part because they didn't even exist. 

Armenia may rejoice now, but they're jammed between Turkey, Azerbaijan and Georgia. They've just lost a war with Azerbaijan, and have tense relations with Turkey. This cannot end well for Armenia; Azerbaijan will likely intensify pressure to regain territory it lost at the end of the USSR, supported even more by Turkey. 

I wonder if Biden looks at the map. Turkey is a NATO member and effectively controls access to the Black Sea. It has its own tense relationship with Russia. Russia is clearly wanting to reclaim the Ukraine and to this end is amassing troops along its border and will close the Sea of Azov for naval vessels for the next six months. If things kick off, will Turkey care, or will they support Russia and close the Black Sea? Basically, if all that happens, the Ukraine is jiggered. 

When Biden was elected I warned he was a warmonger, and it turns out a very foolish one at that. I cannot see how the US can come out of this ahead. The Armenian community in California may be satisfied, but that's about it. Armenia itself could well be on its way to receiving a hiding and the Ukraine may well lose its fully independent status. All of these outcomes fuelled by such a stupid statement by Joe Biden.

Joe Biden Makes Sound

Earth Day summit and what do we get? Completely unrealistic emissions targets, that's what. Confirmation the world has gone mad. Wasn't a pandemic that wasn't really a pandemic enough already? 

It's easy to see why the USA cannot, and I stress cannot, reduce emissions by up to 52% (note the 2%, clever not rounding it eh, why not make it 55.75% and sound really authoritative). Population growth. By 2030 the US will have in the region of 360 million people. They'll all want to be fed, housed, and transported. Halving emissions is a pipe dream and foolish. Foolish because it's genocidal in scale. Think about that, even if they only try and fail badly, a lot of people are going to die. 

That Super Soccer (Association Football) League

Now for a more balanced view of the proposed Super League, effectively gutting England's Premier League along with the equivalents in Spain and Italy. There are positives and negatives as I see them, first I'll deal with the positives.

Fans going to see their favourite team play are not guaranteed to see the best of that team. Due to the busy schedule the teams regularly play their extended squad. Want to see Lionel Messi? You're not guaranteed to see him turn out. You're watching the team, not the players. That's fair enough but these games and merchandise are expensive and so fans should be guaranteed something. What the super league does is better provide for that market. Fans will more likely see the big names.

However, bad is that these big teams looking to break away have disrespected their opponents. What made these big name teams? They didn't get to the top on their own, they needed fans and players but above all opponents. Clearly, over 100 or so years these big teams have won more than they've lost. But they needed those opponents, without them they'd be nothing. So wanting to walk now is a low blow, they're cherry picking and forgetting their roots.

The new proposal can be compared to the NBA which has 30 teams and no promotion or relegation. The teams persist, with only the city that hosts them, the players, management and ownership changing. They don't promote a team from minor leagues to replace the bottom NBA team as that would destroy brand value. It makes sense, so why is this not credible with the current proposal as it relates to European football?

The answer is simple and I've hinted at it above. The NBA teams were created from nothing, they're inventions in effect (let's not get carried away with how the NBA was formed, I'm generalising here). But hang on, these European teams already exist as big names in their respective competitions. We're not comparing apples with apples.

If the owners of Manchester United and Real Madrid want to set up a new super league, then do so by creating new brands, new teams, and buy the players for the league. Start from scratch as the NBA did. Do the job honestly. There are other examples in sport, in Cricket we had World Series Cricket launched by Kerry Packer which revolutionised the one day game, and right now the Indian Premier League is making big money. They use new teams for these competitions, they're starting from scratch.

I notice divided opinion on this subject. Andre Walker is one conservative voice on YouTube who backed the super league, resulting in a backlash against him. No doubt he's looking at the positives and there are many. But the way I see it, the backers have to start from scratch, do it the right way, and then there is hope.

New Football Super League

What traitors they are, the six English Premier League teams looking to set up a new European league stacked with rich clubs. Throw them out of all existing competitions and ban their players from the transfer market, and ban the players from playing for their country. They're a bunch of Prince Harry's, ditching all that has made them for a short term payday. 

Effective COVID-19 Response

Which country had the best response to COVID-19? There are only a few contenders, and Vietnam must be right up the front for top honours. With a population of nearly 100 million they've kept their case numbers low and suffered only 35 deaths. Note that they didn't completely lock down, meaning they still have an economy left. Good for them.

https://ourworldindata.org/covid-exemplar-vietnam

Did the Nazis Win The War?

I've said it many times; if an alien visited Earth in 1939, then came back now, they'd be convinced the Nazis had won the war. Especially right now, as we have global authoritarianism, lack of individual freedom, big corporates that are above the law and a media that is compliant and feeding the populous the official 'truth'. All are being subjected to medical experimentation. Facts are no longer facts, all facts are now checked and if they conflict with the mainstream narrative they are labelled false, or mostly false. We have sunk into the abyss. 

Are COVID-19 Vaccines Safe?

Let's look at the facts as they relate to New Zealand. The Ministry of Health has agreed to buy several COVID-19 vaccines:

Pfizer

Janssen

Novavax

AstraZeneca

Right now, 50% of these vaccines have been withdrawn or suspended due to serious problems, such as blood clots causing death. They are Janssen and AstraZeneca. 

Here's the Ministry's list: https://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/diseases-and-conditions/covid-19-novel-coronavirus/covid-19-vaccines/covid-19-types-vaccines#:~:text=COVID-19%20vaccines-,Novavax,Enough%20for%205.36%20million%20people.

The question needs to be asked: why is the government medically experimenting on the people of New Zealand? The roll out of all vaccines should be immediately halted until full clinical trials can be completed. The COVID-19 coronavirus turns out to be not that serious, more than 99% of people who catch it recover. Stop this nonsense right now.

Prince Philip Dead: Aged 99

Sad news, Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh has died aged 99. What a great man he was. No doubt he'll get a good send-off, full military honours and all that.

Labour Phasing Out Coal Boilers

Someone needs to sit the current New Zealand Labour government down and point out the facts surrounding having a developed economy. Such an economy needs coal fired boilers. All alternatives just don't measure up. In reality, not only are the alternatives a poor source of energy, but they're also not that environmentally friendly. Oh dear, NZ really is going to hell in a handcart.

Lydia Ko 2nd at ANA Inspiration

Good to see Lydia Ko returning to form. She looks fit and seems to be taller now at age 23. Her putting is superb and she plays her own game once again. In the past I believe she's been listening to the wrong people, apparently those days are behind her as she racks up solid result after result. Wins will come in time. If she continues to play like this she'll be back to number 1 in no time.

General Election 2020: Bruce Crocombe

I received the following in my inbox today. It is a complaint laid before the Ombudsman about the General Election 2020.

Post: The Ombudsman, PO Box 10152, Wellington 6143

Summary of Actions required to satisfy my complaint regarding the 2020 Elections:

Stop the election 2020 Ballots, and all associated documents, being destroyed in April 2021.

The “Certificate of Results” forms should be made available to the Voting Place Managers, Justice of the Peace and Returning Officers to validate their signatures. The “Certificate of Results” should posted on the Electoral commission website for public scrutiny (alongside the other two already available, computer generated documents).

Reasons for my concern:

I was a Convener for the 2020 elections. The polling station I voted in was set up in a way to promote Maori views and promote the Labour party narrative that “this is a COVID election”. I laid a complaint to the returning officer who forwarded it to the electoral commission. That complaint was not even answered. Due to this lack of action I furthered my investigations. I became aware that the election process has many failures which led to these elections being illegal. In my discussions with others I was concerned that their observations also questioned the integrity of the election.

Who is affected by my observations and concerns?

This affects me personally as I now consider that this election win was gained by fraudulent activity. My faith in democracy is crushed! This affects the integrity of the people working in the voting places, Justice of the peace and scrutineers. It also affects all voters who may have had their vote ignored, swapped or never had it counted. It affects all New Zealand who did not vote for this Government.

My Complaint: There is no way to check that the vote count in the electorate polling place on 17th of October 2020 is reflected in the final results published on 5th November 2020.

My observations have covered the entire voting arena however am focusing my complaint on what I consider to be the most critical flaw. There is no way to check that the vote count in the electorate polling place on 17th October 2020 is reflected in the final results published on 5th November 2020. The integrity of the process, from voting to publishing results, does not allow a manual audit trail. It appears to be designed to impede any audit, stop observational assessments to be made on voting trends and allow easy access (at many stages) for fraudulent activity.

Actions I wish to be taken in the interests of this being an open, auditable, government Election:

1st

Stop the Ballots, and all associated documents, being destroyed. [As per section 189 of the Electoral Act 1993 - “Despite subsection (2), a packet or parcel may not be destroyed so long as the packet or parcel is, or may reasonably be expected to be, required for the purposes of an investigation into, or a prosecution of, an offence against this Act”].

An “Execution of stay” should be imposed on the ballots, and all associated documents, as they are legally allowed to be destroyed six months after the election. Ie. 3rd of April 2021 if they (sneakily) take it from the original election date. 17th April 2021 if from the actual date of the election.

These forms should be made available to the Voting Place Managers, Justice of the Peace and Returning Officers to validate their signatures, then posted (alongside the other two already available documents) on the Electoral commission website for public scrutiny.

I wish the public to view and copy for analysis all of the preliminary vote counts done by the Polling Place Managers and recorded by hand on the “certificate of results” forms.

2nd

I wish to firmly establish that this is not a request for a recount! It does not follow any existing pre described procedure. The objective is not to correlate the ballot count to the “Certificate of results” The object is to manually compare the many “Certificate of results” counts generated by the polling places to the “spread sheet” compiled electronically and printed of from the “Election Management System” (CATALYST). Then to compare the totals calculated from the “Certificate of results” to the “Official results certificate” for each electorate.

The information on each electorate’s forms should match that recorded on the computer generated spreadsheet. If not, a forensic audit of the actual ballots should be undertaken by an agency independent from any Government pressure as this would be a case of Government sponsored election fraud!

3rd

This is an investigation into a part of the electoral process. It should be done independently from any electoral commission interference, under the scrutiny of well briefed Conservative and Labour Party scrutineers. An independent party must manage the procedure (outlined in the 2nd part) to be followed. Do not allow the Electoral Commission to redirect or change the focus the process.

There is absolutely no reason that this additional document cannot made public.

The information (“Certificate of Results” form) represents ‘open Government’, is part of the election process and does not in any way compromise the publics privacy. The scrutineer’s handbook states that the results of the early count can be disclosed after 7 pm on Election Day (if you can get a copy of it). This information is not deemed sensitive after this time. The very same information, all be it printed from a computer data base, is available on the Government web site.

Evaluation Brief:

1) Compartmentalisation of vote counting – That is, the votes are handled in parcels, which will not allow tabulation of these parcels with other parcels during the preliminary count, Official count or recounts. Votes are counted, recorded then all information secured for that count. I understand the electoral process and am clear that counting the votes is deliberately compartmentalised in this way to control the availability of information. This was further compounded when additional voting places were set up. This stops people working in the process from observing more than one count and forming an opinion on voting trends. It means that any observations made in one voting place cannot be shared to get an overall electorate assessment. There is no way to get an evidence based assessment of results in one voting place (two counts and specials), or a total for the electorate. All people are forced to accept the computer controlled data without audit.

2) Confusing and illogical ‘access to information’ requirements – Photography is allowed to copy voter sensitive data, yet no photography is allowed of the “Certificate of Results”? The only way to get these results would be to copy them by hand from the “Certificate of Results” form. No mention is made that this can be done however it is previously stated that you cannot touch forms. They need to be presented to you. They are locked away ensuring the tabulation of results is only done by computer. A manual audit trail is made impossible. The Electoral Act 1993 provides for results to be challenged through recounts and petitions on certain grounds. It does not allow for manual tabulation of electorate count totals! It does not provide for auditing a sample of votes. There is also no mandate for forensic audits of samples of ballots (if the name and address is correct they are accepted). When the Electoral Commission is questioned they include confusing references to the naming of forms and redirect your attention to the computer generated data. When comparing the Electoral Act with the procedures outlined in the Electoral Commission web site gives actions happening differently and out of chronological sequence.

3) The “Election Management System” i.e. the vote tabulation software, is supplied by CATALYST. NET LIMITED, NZ Company Number 952897. Its program is “open source” meaning that the programming can be changed by the owner. Catalyst is also on the internet for the duration of the election hence open to hacking or nefarious access. There is nothing secure with this system and the assurances of security, given by the electoral commission, are not backed up with any tangible evidence of security or audit trail.

4) Performing an Audit. Vote counting is compartmentalized so no voter trends can be observed. The only opportunity to audit the integrity of the election results being keyed into the “Electoral Management System” and the numbers being presented to the public as “Election Results” is blocked. Access to the “Certificate of Results” form is restricted as no photographic copy can be made. There is no allowance for a manual tabulation of numbers independent from a computer. Official counts and recounts are also compartmentalized and strictly controlled to stop the totaling of all votes so no integrity audit can be done.

5) The Electoral Act 1993 is written without any references to manual or computer handling of data. There are also no references to a means to audit tabulated election data. This is a very concerning failure of process. An evaluation of the Act is included with this complaint.

6) The Electoral Commission Web site. An evaluation of the Electoral Commission Web site is included with this complaint.

7) The Scrutineers hand book. An evaluation of The Scrutineers hand book is included with this complaint.

Definitions (from the Electoral Act 1993) of the three forms completed during the course of elections.

1) “Certificate of results” is the form filled manually to record the count done on Election Day for either advance votes, counted after 9 am, or for votes cast on polling day, counted after 7pm.

These votes are (generally) counted in the polling place, and each certificate signed off by the Polling Place Manager and a Justice of the peace.

The “certificate of results” forms are lodged with the Clerk of the House in accordance with section 189 of the Electoral Act 1993 and are not available.

2) “Official results certificate” is the certificate “EMS82-FINAL Official Results Notification Form 2020 General Election and Referendums” that is printed from the “Election Management System” Catalyst, on completion of the final count on November 5th 2020. Each certificate shows the result totals for each electorate.

The “Official Results Certificates” can all be found on the Electoral Commission Web Site How are general election votes counted? | Elections 2020 certificates of results (ZIP, 26MB)

3) Two spread sheets breaking down the Candidate and Party vote count can also be generated from the “Election Management System” Votes Recorded at each Voting Place (electionresults.govt.nz)

Publishing all three forms is perfectly feasible as none of these forms in any way compromises the voter information or the vote cast. They report only vote placement statistics.

Evaluation – full

Assessment of relative correspondence:

1) Compartmentalisation of vote counting –

2) Confusing and illogical ‘access to information’ requirements –

3) The “Election Management System”

4) Performing an Audit.

5) Comparison between the Electoral Act 1993 and Electoral Commission Interpretation

6) The Electoral Commission Web site.

7) The Scrutineers hand book.

Copies of relevant forms are available (via links in the document) on the internet.

Copies of relevant correspondence available:

E mail trail to returning officer, forwarded to Electoral commission.

E mails to/from electoral commission.

Foot note - Other incidental observations:

Ballot boxes, though sealed on the top, can be accessed through the base.

One security company is hired for the whole country. Total control of security allowing for strategic placement of personnel (for both security and nefarious purposes).

Some voting centers took ballot boxes home ‘for security reasons’.

Colmar Brunton polling results were not reflected in Nation Party and other privately undertaken polls.

Massive media bias throughout the build up to the election by Government “financially bailed out” compliant (all major) media outlets.

Many electorates had election results which were contrary to the observational assessments. Not “a bad looser syndrome”, more like a betrayal of observational trend analysis. I.e. South Island going red, Auckland Central going Green, Upper Harbour going Labour….. All difficult to explain “wild card” results.

Lawyer Sue Grey Explains Open Letter to Prime Minister

 

Nasal Spray Approved to Fight COVID-19

Have a look at the below video. The world owes Donald Trump an apology. Back at the start of the pandemic he speculated about something to essentially disinfect the body and he was roundly laughed at by the world media and all and sundry. Well, here you go folks, a simple nasal spray that fights any virus entering the body through the nasal passages. In killing the virus it also prevents transmission.