Now that New Zealand's recent general election has punished the two major parties, Labour and National, voices are now calling for changes to the electoral system, or further rules restricting the distribution of votes and/or restricting voting rights in parliament itself.
That didn't take long, did it!!
In 2026 voters split their votes. On the centre/right, National voters gave their electorate vote to National, but their party vote to ACT or NZ First. Meanwhile, on the centre/left, Labour voters gave their party vote to Opportunity, while the Maori party voters gave their party vote to the Greens or Labour.
This wasn't rigging, it was foreseen by the framers of the MMP system when introduced in 1996. Mixed-Member Proportional allows first-past-the-post at the electorate level and proportional representation at the party level. Voters get to choose their local MP. Thus, Maori voters get their local person, someone they trust, but at the national level they get to vote for policies they see as beneficial. For National, a party made up of farmers and people who live in the provinces, the result is the same, local representation by someone they may even know, while at the national level, they see their interests being represented.
The framers of MMP said that when this happens it forces the parties to seek coalition agreement. MMP works as a filter of policy but results in everyone still having a local MP. All other systems risk losing that, and would likely see urban elites having ascendancy.
NZ got the result it wanted. Be wary of those calling for reforms to a flawed system. Do I think MMP is flawed? Yes, and I've many times called for a return to first-part-the-post only. Failing that, it is better to keep things the way they stand now.
