Questions have to be asked about why the New Zealand taxpayer paid for its prime minister to fly across the world to meet the head of the World Economic Forum.
Check this: two RNZAF Boeing 757's were used to take the PM's entourage of 80, to meet a man who is head of an organisation that promotes the killing of all pet cats and dogs.
Think I'm exaggerating? I googled the subject and the following link came up ranked fourth in the results:
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/wef-wants-to-slaughter-millions-of-pet-cats-and-dogs-to-fight-climate-change/
Some lowlights, this is the sort of drivel the WEF is pushing:
The WEF, which has ordered mainstream media outlets to begin pushing the narrative, wants to introduce an international policy that would require the majority of pet owners to euthanize their animals.
CNN, always at the forefront in pushing the globalist agenda, has begun urging its viewers to starve their pets to death in an effort to combat climate change.
CNN published an article on their website recently entitled, “Our pets are part of the climate problem. These tips can help you minimize their carbon pawprints“. In the article, the liberal sadists at CNN argue that the meat-heavy diet of many household pets is causing planet-warming gases to be released into the atmosphere.
Responsible pet owners should trade in their best friend for a turtle for the planet. “Snakes, turtles and reptiles can have a really low impact,” CNN suggests.
Your kitty kat and pooch, CNN explains, are going to have to eat bugs just like you, assuming Klaus Schwab allows you to keep them at all in the future.
Bloomberg, another mouthpiece of the global elite, jumped on the bandwagon at the same time, urging pet owners to let their pets die to fight inflation.
Hollywood celebrity Emma Thompson has gone even further, telling pet owners to eat their own pets to survive the so-called climate crisis.
The proposed policy was met with outrage by animal rights groups and pet owners who argue that it is unethical and unnecessary. Many are also concerned about the lack of consultation with pet owners before such a drastic decision was made.
Despite the backlash, the WEF maintains that this measure is necessary as it believes reducing the number of pets around the world will help reduce global warming and other environmental issues caused by overpopulation. It also claims that the policy will help reduce animal cruelty, as it will ensure no pet is subjected to neglect or mistreatment.
The WEF has also come under fire for its lack of transparency in how this initiative was proposed and developed. The organization has yet to provide any evidence that suggests euthanizing pets will have a positive impact on the environment or combat animal cruelty.
However, if you have been paying attention to the WEF’s policies in recent times you will realize that this is not really about saving the world. WEF policies all have one thing in common: they dehumanize, degrade and mock us. They are designed to take away all of the joys of life and inflict maximum pain.
The campaign to force humanity to give up meat and subsist on bugs and crickets is a good example. A WEF insider actually admitted it is about “crushing the human soul.”
