Did They Meet?

I found the following very interesting. It questions whether Prince Harry and Meghan Markle met King Charles recently.

King Charles Breaks with Constitution

On the quiet, while no-one was watching, King Charles has stopped describing himself as Head of the Church of England and Defender of the Faith. Now he describes himself as protecting the space for faith within the multifaith nation. He spouts complete drivel in other words. 

The below video explains what has happened. I'm finding it hard to obtain a video explaining this succinctly. Most commentators blather on about irrelevancies, even this one, but at least it does get around to spitting it out.

Nice Little Rant

 Enough of the crap...

King's Christmas Message 2025

As I see it, King Charles gave two messages loud and clear at his annual Christmas address. The first is get ready to fight a war. He mentioned the young die in wars and images of veterans and wounded soldiers kept popping up throughout. 

The second message was that Jesus was on a journey, looking for understanding and just wanting to get along (my words). This conflicts with scripture; the Christian message is repentance, confess your sins and sin no more. That there is no other path to salvation than through Him. Life isn't about wombling along as some kind of New Age Hippie. 

Charles isn't a Christian, and he has no place being head of the Church of England. 

Andrew Lownie on Where to from Here

The British Royal Family face interesting times. More scandals are anticipated and author Andrew Lownie sums things up succinctly. 

Mr Andrew Mountbatten Windsor

Yes, indeed, Andrew is no longer a prince. Can the King do this? Probably he can, using letters patent. However, he probably cannot remove Andrew from the Line of Succession, that would require laws be passed through several parliaments around the world. By all means correct me on this.

More Scandal

With the latest revelations surrounding Prince Andrew's contact with and activities with Jeffrey Epstein, it is about time the British handed him over to the FBI for a formal interview. The email Epstein sent is really quite telling, it used the words "...we'll play some more soon!!!

Declaration of Civil War?

This is an interesting analysis of the King's Christmas message, and where we are at this time:

Divorce Announcement?

Someone has posted on X that Prince Harry has filed for divorce. This may be more nonsense, but it does sound like the timing is right, what with King Charles in Samoa for the CHOGM meeting, and recent reports that Prince Harry has bought a property in Portugal.

If true, sit back and watch the British taxpayer as they realise they're going to have to pay for this divorce. The key is paying Meghan Markle to stay silent. Do you think that is possible, and what kind of number would you put on it? I think mid range nine figures 400-500 million, that sort of number. 

Prince Harry in London

In the weeks leading up to Prince Harry's attendance at the upcoming Invictus Games ceremony at St Paul's Cathedral in London, speculation has been rife about whether there will be rapprochement between the wayward son and his father, King Charles III and his brother, the Prince of Wales.

I always thought this highly unlikely, and the recent statement from Prince Harry's UK representative was rather telling:

https://www.elle.com/culture/celebrities/a60721383/meghan-markle-prince-harry-rep-king-charles-london-visit-statement/

Their spokesperson said in a rare statement, “In response to the many inquiries and continued speculation on whether or not the duke will meet with his father while in the U.K. this week, it unfortunately will not be possible due to His Majesty’s full program. The duke of course is understanding of his father’s diary of commitments and various other priorities and hopes to see him soon.”

The media have been doing a lot of wishful thinking. Let's get real here, Prince Harry has been a fool. Read those last six words again Harry, I know you're reading this, you're all over social media.

In some quarters, commentators are saying the King should forgive Harry, that the King should show leadership. No, leadership isn't only about warm embraces. Those who step outside the boundary lines can expect to be dismissed. It pays to be firm and decisive. 

Looked at in broader context, consider the way Harry was raised. In his world he was surrounded by sycophants. He was never told a firm no, and every statement he made was likely met with praise regarding the perspicacity and verisimilitude of his utterances, no matter how banal.

Therefore, it is likely Harry has no idea he's considered a laughing stock, or that his ideas are rubbish. Want examples of this? He is reported to have thought he could interview the likes of the Pope and Vladimir Putin about their childhood trauma. No, I'm not joking, he really thought he could pull it off. Another example: he thought it a good idea, telling of his brother's circumcised penis in that book of his. Reflect on this for a minute, Harry talked about the private parts of a man who will be King. 

Harry and Meghan: Busting up?

Those amongst you who follow British Royal Family gossip will be aware that the mainstream media are currently running stories about a rapprochement between the two brothers; William, the Prince of Wales and Harry, the Duke of Sussex. The angle these days appears to be of how Harry regrets, Harry is returning and wishes to reunite with family, Harry has something to offer, Harry this and Harry that.

Reading between the lines, I figure Harry's marriage is coming to an end and the Palace is smoothing the way for his return to England. They've begun the process of rehabilitating him. I always said, that no matter how much money he lost, no matter how much he disgraced himself, the firm would always take him back and warehouse him in one of their palaces. They'd do this, not because they want to, but because they have to. The King and the Prince of Wales cannot have a loose cannon wandering around California making a fool of himself.

As well, it just so happens that Lady Colin Campbell has published an updated version of her earlier book about Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. You can buy a copy here: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Meghan-Harry-Persecutors-Victims-Updated/dp/1916131786 Significantly, the book calls into question the circumstances surrounding the birth of their children. Lady C is currently being interviewed across social media talking about this, and some of what she has to say is very interesting.

Looking at this broadly, with the above book out, and with just about every commercial endeavour having failed, Prince Harry is left without any other options. And on the other side of the equation sits his wife, a Californian actress. She'll have her own agenda.

What I am surprised about is how long this relationship lasted. On top of that is how long they've survived in California. I'm giving them at least 4.5/10, don't say I'm not generous.

People often say that this kind of gossip is nonsense, but I find there is usually no smoke without fire. There will be some truth behind the speculation. Right now, the internet is 'on fire' and that must be someone or some group fueling it. My guess is the Palace, Harry, his wife and other entities are at work. 

King Charles III Cancer

Buckingham Palace have announced that King Charles has cancer. A few days ago he went into hospital for a medical procedure due to his enlarged prostate, but they claim that during that visit another area of concern was discovered and this was not benign. Therefore, he is suspending all duties while he undergoes treatment (please see the announcement below).

Is anyone seeing a pattern here? An announcement is made that appears to be everyday, that later turns out to be much more serious. The Palace is gradually breaking the news to us.

Another recent case is that of Catherine, The Princess of Wales. The Palace announced she was admitted to the same hospital as Charles, in her case for abdominal surgery. But she was not seen arriving, nor leaving, and her family did not visit while she was said to be in the hospital. Where is she?

King Charles 2023 Christmas Message

What was that? I've just seen what I think is the worst Christmas message given by a reigning British Monarch. I'll have to see it again, but just off the top of my head after having sat through this nonsense:

Charles hardly ever mentioned the Commonwealth (I think I heard it said once). 

Did he mention his own family? They're probably there, I'll review but if you blinked you missed it. [Upon review, he never mentions any of his children or grandchildren by name, but he says the word family a couple of times and shows pictures of them doing stuff.]

I heard the word conflict once, genocide seems to be something you don't talk about these days. 

When it comes to religion, bear in mind this is a Christian festival, honouring the birth of Jesus. What I've just witnessed is a pseudo Christian message spliced with woke, the new religion worshipping the Earth. In this woke world we can be better people from within ourselves, forget about the will of God.

Charles never mentions his own journey, and of his relationship with God. That, I think, is the biggest omission, is Charles even Christian?

He's got to go, this is no King.

Piers Morgan Reveals Royal Names

Piers Morgan has revealed the names of those alleged to have been racist. The two named are the least racist people I would have thought. 

Can we all just agree to now cancel Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. How about we not talk about them ever. Never ever. Just don't print anything, show any pictures on the Telly, nothing. They're pointless, let's get them out of the news cycle, we have serious things to consider, not these two.

 

DNA Test British Royal Family - Yes or No?

With the technology being available, should the British Royal Family be subject to a DNA test, to ensure only those descending from the blood of the Monarch are included in the Line of Succession.

King Charles III has been sworn in and crowned so he cannot be touched. But the technology could be applied to all those in the top 30 below him. It wouldn't be that complicated. If anyone fails, all their children are immediately cancelled.

If Prince William failed, all his children are also immediately removed. The same then applies to Prince Harry and on down the line. This would ensure purity of the genes.

Parliament could pass such a law. It makes sense, but imagine the squeals from those required to undergo a test. If they refused, they'd also be removed from the line.

The Coronation

I've been asked, will I be watching King Charles being crowned on Saturday. Yes, I'll watch some of it, but not everything as it'll go on too long. I'm interested to hear if the King declares himself defender of the faith, or as defender of faith. If he says the latter, well, I'll be appalled.

Will Prince Harry be in attendance? Park him in a side area with a curtain around him so those in Westminster Abbey don't have to see him.

But, for the bigger picture, I'm feeling sad for the UK as a whole. They have two unelected leaders, King Charles and Rishi Sunak. I'd like to see democratic rule return, and the reinstatement of freedom of speech. The Conservative Party have had 13 years and the country has gone backward. About time to see some significant change.

Update: I watched some of it, and found it all a bit boring to be honest. Pippa Middleton was looking hot, so there was that to cheer me up. And yes, stealing the show was Penny Mordaunt, the first female Lord President of the Council, carrying the sword and looking rather hot too.

Prince Harry was there, shame about that. There was an inclusion about fostering faiths, but it wasn't offensive to Anglicans. And it was good to see the Gold State Coach. I can see why King Charles wanted to shorten the ceremony, even at its current length it seemed a bit long. 

Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet

Piers Morgan makes some very good points about the Montecito duo choosing to call their children Prince and Princess. They have that right of course since the Letters Patent 1917. However, for a couple to now use those titles when all they've done is constantly attack the institution is the height of hypocrisy. Check out the official royal website, where you can see the two children are now Prince Archie of Sussex and Princess Lilibet of Sussex. https://www.royal.uk/succession

 

King Charles Message: Grow a Backbone.

Ann Widdecombe nails it, not having Prince Harry grandstanding at the Coronation solves a lot of problems. Yes, there'd be an initial negative reaction, but people would soon get over him being banned. Not having him there means his toxicity could not spread. Deny him oxygen.

 

Prince Harry Denies Racism Claims

My latest theory: the Prince Harry memoir 'Spare' is being talked about across all media platforms to avoid having to lead with the start of the Russian winter offensive in Ukraine. The fall of Soledar must not be mentioned - at any cost.

That said, it appears we have something of a stand-off between the California based prince and Buckingham Palace. This is what I think is going on; the Palace are quietly saying they have all the gossip on their wayward number 5 so better not go there, while number 5 in reply is saying you've got nothing on us compared to what we've got on you lot, so neener neener.

If the latter claim is true, then the British Royal Family will be forced to pay them off, and I'm talking a jaw dropping sum of money. If not true and the British Royal Family go nuclear, number 5 and his descendants may be removed from the line of succession and the King's son may end up driving a truck down the I5 for a living.

I'm embedding the below video on the subject to give this YouTuber a bit of a boost. She supplies a summary of what is in the news without her subscribers having to wade through the dross just to find one interesting tidbit. 

Prince Harry and his Children

I've been sitting on the fence about this one, there are those who say Prince Harry has no children. Until recently I'd just say I don't know, but I'd like to see them in the flesh. 

Archie Mountbatten-Windsor would be 3 years 5 months of age by now; he should be attending Kindergarten. Where is there evidence of his existence?

Lilibet Mountbatten-Windsor would be 1 year and 4 months old and we have even less evidence of her existence. 

But, recently I decided to simply consider these children non-existent apart from in the form of child actors (or children borrowed from friends or whatever). That's because of Harry's unconvincing statements online. He described Archie's squeaky voice and said that Lilibet was finding her voice. In describing them he did not sound like a parent at all. 

King Charles must demand the children be proven, have them DNA tested and have witnesses swear on oath that Prince Harry's wife gave birth to them. I suspect this is going to become the biggest royal scandal of the century when fully exposed.