Showing posts with label NZ Army. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NZ Army. Show all posts

March 13, 2026

Make Your Own Diesel

This video shows how an American bloke has his diesel engine running on any oil, check it out. I'm placing this here to motivate my fellow Kiwis to get in touch with their elected representatives, insisting they stop messing about, and treat the current fuel situation as the real crisis that it is.

Here's how the government can do this:

  1. Get the mechanical and chemical engineering departments of New Zealand universities together to sort out what works best, quickest, ignoring environmental, health and safety, just how to get enough diesel to power emergency response, trains, ferries, farms, hospitals and key transport and agriculture;
  2. Mobilise the NZ Army engineers;
  3. Using existing emergency legislation, grab all those elements needed to feed NZ's own set-up; 
  4. Cease exporting oil in the immediate sense.
  5. As a side project look at all wood waste and how much of it can be quickly turned to ethanol;
  6. Treat LPG as like 4 and 5 above;
  7. Then roll this out; what is created is a system of liquid fuels which can all run engines of differing types whether it be fuel oil, diesel, petrol etc.,
  8. You've got 60 days.

February 19, 2022

New Zealand Freedom Revolution

Wellington: the Police have cordoned off several streets around Parliament and this is now essentially an area for a free festival of freedom with thousands of people attending. 

This is a huge humiliation for Trevor Mallard and Jabcinda Ardern. I don't see how Ardern can remain in office. Clearly the Police are not listening to her, and the Army don't return calls either. 

Time to pack up and leave Jabcinda. On yer bike.

July 31, 2020

NZ SAS Professional - Operation Burnham

For a decade the New Zealand SAS have been subjected to attacks on their conduct during Operation Burnham in Afghanistan. NZ media have continued these attacks (see the link below). However, buried in this article is the following snippet; the SAS did nothing wrong, they acted professionally.

The SAS soldiers have not been found to be directly responsible for any wrongful civilian deaths, and the report said they acted professionally during the raid.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/122306197/operation-burnham-inquiry-child-was-likely-killed-sas-soldiers-misled-prisoner-was-tortured

July 08, 2020

NZ Army: New Protected Mobility Vehicle

New Zealand are buying the Australian built Bushmaster for its army.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/122067489/new-armoured-vehicle-purchase-replaces-ageing-fleet

This is fine, but readers will be aware this is a drop in the bucket of what NZ needs to be spending. It continues to underinvest on defence and this won't be reversed soon. Too little too late?

October 10, 2018

Christchurch, NZ: 100 Years Since End of First World War

Found the crosses laid out in Christchurch's Cranmer Square today. There is one cross for every soldier from Canterbury in New Zealand, who fell during The Great War, 1914-18.

If of the Jewish faith there is a Star of David instead of a cross.





March 21, 2017

Alleged New Zealand War Crime

Journalist and writer Nicky Hager has written an explosive new book launched today. Titled, Hit & Run, it describes a NZ SAS revenge raid in Afghanistan which was supposedly approved in advance by the Prime Minister at the time, John Key.  Was the expected launch of this book the reason for John Key's surprise resignation?

An audio from Radio NZ of the lauch can be found here: http://www.radionz.co.nz/audio/player?audio_id=201837462

January 07, 2017

Blueprint for the New Zealand Armed Forces

It's 2017 and the New Zealand armed services keep shrinking. Will they cease to exist in my lifetime? Possibly, it's a sad state of affairs.

The reason things are in such a bad way goes to leadership. It's down to poor leadership from the people who run the country. There is no-one who can say, hand on heart, that they did their best.

The way I look at defence is like this: New Zealand has built something worth protecting, it's rich in natural resources and is a fully developed country (for the most part), all completed in less than two hundred years. The country is valuable, so look after it.

It's scary to think that one missile cruiser parked off the New Zealand coast would own the place. New Zealand has nothing to deter such a threat. Heck, ISIL or whatever they're called could load up three or four cruise ships and invade. They'd likely succeed. That's even scarier.

If you want farce and a sign pointing to just how feeble NZ is, consider when their frigate tried pulling over an illegal fishing boat in the southern ocean. It refused to comply and the frigate had to run away. I presume the fishing boat had more fire power than the frigate. Unbelievable.

If we look at comparable forces, NZ lags behind. Norway, for instance, has a similar population and standard of living as NZ and they take their military seriously. Norway is a useful benchmark; they have a long coastline, are located in a polar region, and have a large area of ocean to defend with abundant natural resources.

The following is a suggested structure for New Zealand, doing away with unnecessary parts of the force but ramping up those areas that are in dire need of enhancement.

Step 1: do away with Navy, Army and Air Force as separate services and merge everything into one force along the lines of the US Marine Corps. NZ pays lip service to the idea, so actually do it. Get rid of all those different uniforms and ranks, keep it simple.

Currently, NZ rotates the top job through the three branches. Stop that nonsense, have one top person in charge and let them keep that job until replaced by someone better or they retire. Think continuity and a clear direction.

Step 2: Reconfigure bases now everything is merged together.

Close down

Devonport
Whenuapai
Linton
Trentham
Woodbourne
Burnham

Retain

Ohakea
Waiouru - use it for exercises only, de-escalate as a base
Lake Tekapo
Other facilities not mentioned, or relocate and modernise

Build

A large base on the Kaipara harbour around where the United States set up during the Second World War (if not viable; then Opononi or Manukau, in any case west coast Northland or Auckland, not east coast). Think along the lines of Camp Pendleton. The Kaipara Harbour is shallow and plagued by tricky sandbars so difficult for an enemy to penetrate (dredge the channels). Devonport naval base is located on the Waitemata Harbour, a deep water port on the east coast and easily accessed for commercial shipping. Any student of history will know the east coast was mined during the Second World War and a ship was sunk (RMS Niagara). Why would NZ have its warships in that harbour or along the east coast?

The Kaipara base would also replace Whenuapai and the North Island army bases apart from Waiouru which would be used for exercises, rather like Salisbury plain.

The Marlborough Sounds should also be utilised more effectively (see below). You'll notice I'm putting things along the west coast of NZ, out to the Tasman Sea. There's a reason for this, any aggressor at least has to enter the Tasman to be effective. Why make things easy for the enemy?

Then build a base up around Niue, or Tonga, well into the Pacific.

Like this:

Devonport ➨                                                                          
Whenuapai ➨                                          
Linton ➨     
Trentham ➨                                          
Woodbourne ➨                                          
Burnham ➨                                        

All these merge into ➽

Pacific Islands base
Kaipara main base all-in-one
Waiouru exercise area
Ohakea air base and land forces
Marlborough Sounds subs and mine warfare
Lake Tekapo exercise area
Town depots/yards, reserves muster


Many of the town depots and facilities are now unsuitable. Take the Christchurch city base HMNZS Pegasus. Look at the US and how they operate reserves, often they base these facilities in light industrial areas with a small office, yard and warehouse. They look like a rental or hire pool. NZ could do much the same and save money overall.

Step 3: Build a proper Navy

New Zealand consists of many islands in the South Pacific. It's territory is vast and claims one of the largest areas of ocean in the world. Most just think of the North and South Islands. But New Zealand extends north to the Tokelau, Cook and Niue Islands, east out to the Chatham Islands, then south down to Antarctica. A big area in other words, which NZ defends with two frigates, a RORO vessel and two offshore patrol vessels. That's pretty much it, and they struggle with that. If you want to laugh you can, but I'm not trying to be funny.

Norway by comparison has seventy, that's 7-0- sea going warships of various configurations, but from a NZ perspective note their five heavy frigates, ice breaker and six submarines. They take mine warfare seriously too.

But wait, Norway is richer. That's right, NZ's GDP is 36% that of Norway, which means NZ should have about 25 warships. Think about it, that sounds about right.

Therefore:

Scrap or Sell

The two Anzac class frigates (now ageing and never equipped with Harpoon - see below)
The RORO
Oiler (old)

Build

2 amphibious warfare ships, utilising helicopters and landing craft, able to conduct opposed landings within the Pacific and able to operate in large swells.
4 frigates
4 submarines
4 corvettes (escorts)
2 oilers
1 dive, mine warfare
1 ice breaker, disaster relief, scientific

Retain

2 offshore patrol
4 inshore patrol
1 dive, mine warfare

Total = 25

Deployed these would form two mini groups, thus each mini group configures:

1 amphibious
2 frigates
2 submarines
1 oiler
2 escort corvettes

As a group the amphibious ship is the heart and in the middle. These ships would be around 20,000 tonnes.

The frigates protect and they must be close to being destroyers, like Norway. The subs prowl, observe and protect while the escort corvettes form the outer patrol.

Some may remember a NZ Minister of Defence in the 1990's by the name of Doug Kidd, suggesting submarines. He must have had a rare moment of clarity. Subs project power far out of proportion to their size and manning levels. Subs mean New Zealand can be unseen, observe without being observed, slip special forces ashore, and be a threat to any enemy. For some odd reason Doug Kidd was shouted down, subs seem to trigger alarm amongst the loose limbed liberals, but in reality they're brilliant and should be taken seriously, Japan's Soryu class submarine is an excellent example.

Base these submarines in the Marlborough Sounds. From there they can slip out into the Tasman or through Cook Strait and into the South Pacific.

The balance, being dive and mine warfare operate where required.

Form a coast guard division within the all-in-one service; they then operate the offshore patrol vessels, inshore patrol, and the ice breaker/scientific vessel. They would also do fisheries protection.

Step 4: Get some force into the air

This is pretty simple, go high and be able to hit. Currently NZ has no, literally no high flying and fast air strike.

The closing down of NZ's Skyhawk air strike capability was the biggest cock-up ever perpetrated on NZ's defences. It never ceases to amaze me how often I hear people talk about this, like it was a sensible decision given the planes were old. They weren't supersonic. Oh no.

Well get a grip NZ. All air combat is conducted at subsonic speeds and to secure your own airspace all you need is a capable aircraft like the Skyhawk. It posed enough of a deterrent to make anyone contemplating something, to think again. Now, there is nothing keeping NZ's airspace safe.

Back in 2005 a nutter got the idea to threaten to fly his plane into the Skytower in Auckland. No means existed to prevent him then and none exists now. The guy got airborne but chickened out, righto, and NZ seems to accept that hoping someone will chicken out is an effective defence strategy.

Scrap

P-3 Orions
C-130 Hercules
Boeing 757's

Add

Drones - for search, patrol and combat. Also invest in drone swarm attack. This is where 10 or so drones simultaneously attack a ship, overwhelming its defences in doing so. The cost of these sort of disposable drones is less than the cost of sea skimming missiles that are often less effective.
Modern airlift - 12 units of modern C-130 Hercules or similar. Consider airlift at least in part which can fly to Antarctica and back without a point of no return (the C-130 is limited by range); this means procuring at least two C-17 Globemasters if they can be found.
Additional helicopters - 16 combat types for the amphibious vessels (8 on each), plus a further 8 larger helicopters such as the Chinook (enough helicopters exist in service right now to make up the balance).
Modern passenger aircraft less than 10 years old, the current 757's break down all the time.

The thinking here is NZ needs to have some strike capability, the drones can do that, they're also more effective in the search role, being able to see through cloud and to operate at night, spending much longer over any area being looked at. Then add more air lift and combat helicopters to cover the new vessels.

Step 5: Land forces to be amphibious

The land forces should be up to brigade strength and able to operate alone. That is, fully self-contained, not having to ask the Australians or anyone else for help. More to the point, NZ should be able to keep a brigade in the field for months at a time. That means they need twice the number of personnel they have now. Then when those numbers are up, any equipment they use must be suitable for amphibious operations. Currently - not really. They can't wade ashore very easily at all.

Step 6: Use missiles too

If it's a missile get interested in it. Missiles are brilliant. New Zealand hasn't embraced Harpoon. Well, wise up NZ, and join the 21st century. Together with the use of drones, an effective air force could be quite easily obtained.

******

There you have it. What I've suggested isn't cheap. Security never is. The only time you don't regret spending the money is right after a failed burglary when they caught the bad guys. Defence of NZ would be no different, just dig deep and take a long breath. That is of course, unless NZ prefers being a lapdog to someone else. My guess is New Zealanders don't like the idea of being someone's lapdog, but I could be wrong. I prefer to think Kiwis were just lead by stupid people. Kiwis themselves are not stupid. At least I don't think so.

The way I see this force operating is like this; with the large base in Northland, it becomes cheaper to operate and helps develop that depressed province. And with a base farther up into the Pacific islands, NZ can react to anything going on up there, whether disaster relief or helping against insurgency or civil unrest.

The two mini naval groups operate in rotation. One in port and one at sea at any one time. And my hierarchy is Sea > Air > Land in that order. New Zealand is surrounded by ocean and sea power comes first, followed closely by air power.

With the decline in NZ's military, young people have drifted away and they're just not interested in joining the forces any longer. Provide the right structure, do things that are meaningful, and they'll get energised again and join up. Train them and think about post military life. The US has the GI Bill. NZ needs to look at that and see what they can do similarly. But note, the young are not stupid, they see ads on the TV with people jumping out of planes and they know that right now, it's all bullshit.

( Where I say build, NZ does the job or a large part of it, where I say add these are acquired or NZ provides a minor part of the build; does everything need to be brand new? Not necessarily if good secondhand is available).

Edit to add: This week (8-14 Jan 2017) Stuff reported Japanese reports that NZ is shopping for new aircraft: http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/88301398/defence-force-denies-it-has-started-negotiations-with-japan-over-aircraft-order

NZ deny of course, but who would you believe? Oh that's right, the Japanese are to be believed. It looks like NZ favours the Kawasaki P-1 and C-2. Fair enough, they share parts, but I still maintain drones like the MQ-9 Reaper make more sense than a P-1 or P-8. But heh, the fly boys have to have something to get airborne with, that'd be driving their thinking. The C-2 on the other hand is pretty good, read about it here.

Further edit to add (13 July 2018): NZ is buying the P-8. Four units, they're proven functional and there is interoperability with Australia. So fair enough, go with that (you can detect the 'my god they're buying something' reaction). Drones are a little problematic at the moment so I'm told, but the US Navy is working on a Naval example, suitable for naval conditions. Pays to keep looking at that carefully I suggest. The C-2 transporter does not work on unimproved airstrips. True, but the obvious here is that NZ buys both the C-130 and C-2. The C-130 as the utility, the C-2 to replace the 757's, also for flights to Antarctica as it has no point of no return and works well in snow and ice, and it can fit the NH90 helicopters NZ uses. It's not an either/or situation.

December 01, 2016

Manifesto for New Zealand

The following are what I believe to be the critical policies to get New Zealand back on track and leading the world again. Seriously, at one stage little old NZ was top in the OECD, but that was so long ago there are few alive now who remember.

Keys to New Zealand success:-

1. Defence 

The opposite of the problem the United States has, NZ does not spend enough on defence. NZ needs to raise its defence spending to 2% of GDP. I suggest it take the 1.1% of GDP it now spends, take that as a constant and on top of that use the balance to (a) set up a professional Coast Guard service and (b) establish a permanent and full-time disaster relief agency, both bodies to be part of the defence force.

Rationale: think about employment and training, many young people would get the opportunity to learn something and make a contribution. They are denied the chance now. Add to that a readiness to deal with poaching of the fisheries, search and rescue and a better earthquake and tsunami response.

2. Immigration

Freeze immigration until house prices stabilise. The exceptions; marriage and family reunification and refugees.

Rationale: numbers equivalent to the population of New Plymouth arrive every year and many of these new immigrants add very little, they're either too old, over educated or they scarper to Australia at the first opportunity. NZ needs to think very carefully about its immigration policy, to start with, the housing stock has to exist to accommodate them. That isn't the case right now, so Kiwis should put themselves first and halt immigration until housing construction rises.

3. Manufacturing

Back manufacturers in tangible ways and raise the profile of NZ's quality manufactured goods.

Rationale: NZ fools itself into thinking there is such a thing as free trade. Every nation protects its own, it's just that tariff barriers have been lowered.

I'll give you three examples of protectionism; (a) Japan and their vehicle registration which means it's very hard for a car or truck to stay on the road for longer than six years, (b) US defence procurement and the Boeing and Lockheed Martin et al tie ups, (c) Australia and its not letting NZ apples in or bananas from anywhere and its strange requirement for 'lock-out' on industrial machines that means all imported machines must undergo alteration before being put to work - they're all protectionist.

New Zealand has an anaemic economy, with too many service and primary sector businesses and not enough secondary producers.

Industrial sectors NZ should dominate but don't - land clearing, logging, shipping, transport, aircraft.

* Land clearing: NZ was at one time covered with forest but it is now largely farmland with some forest. NZ makes virtually none of the types of machines used to do this work. You'd think that with Africa and South America needing this type of thing that NZ would be there with boots on but it just isn't.

* Logging is huge in NZ. It does make Yarders for pulling logs off hills, and some stuff; wire ropes and the like, but the big brands are from Finland or somewhere else. Why? Oh that's because the Finns and others back their manufacturers.

* NZ has a long coastline and relies on ships to trade, but it doesn't make any cargo ships. Just super-yachts, which don't carry cargo.

* Trailers are made in Kiwiland, but no tractor units or trucks of any kind, name that big Kiwi brand of truck.....Scania, that's Sweden.

* Pacific Aerospace is NZ's only aircraft manufacturer, which is very strange when you consider that NZ invented powered flight and use aircraft extensively (Richard Pearse was the first to fly, not the Wright Brothers, the latter just had the better propaganda machine).

4. Crime

Bring back the death penalty for crimes that have an aggravating factor, like murder with torture, or serial rapists. Bring back hard labour for repeat offenders that are violent.

Rationale: It costs too much to incarcerate these criminals. Execute the bad ones, and work the almost as bad ones. Consider remote locations like building a road from Karamea to Collingwood in the South Island, and a rail line from Gisborne to Whakatane in the North.

5. Education

Take education seriously by making teachers teach.

Rationale: Since the 1970's the system has been skewed toward promoting able teachers out of the classroom and into management. If NZ wants to see better results, it must pay good teachers to stay in the classroom.

6. Social Policy and Full Employment

Anyone registered unemployed should be given a meaningful job.

Rationale: Anyone who wants to work should work. Those not registered or on a sickness benefit clearly either don't want to or cannot. One way of doing this - getting everyone a job - is to take all employers with 10 or more employees and pay them to employ people on the minimum wage, with the government topping up between that amount and a living wage. Rock and hard place approach, each employer would be told how many new hires they have to take, if they decline, any penalty interest on overdue sums to Inland Revenue would double.

7. Oil, Gas and other Minerals

Establish a State mineral exploration company, focussing on New Zealand and the Pacific Islands.

Rationale: NZ should be exploring all the time. There is a lot of oil and gas and other minerals in NZ, just no-one looks very hard. Take the Takaka Hill for instance, it has iron ores, marble, limestone, soap stone, but it is hardly mined. Parliament and the Beehive is made of beautiful marble from Takaka but if you asked at any school, the children would likely guess the marble was from China or Italy.

8. Political reform

Make government a lot smaller, return to first past the post elections and have fewer representatives and fewer state and public servants. Let people get on with their lives without the ever-present government meddling.

Rationale: structure NZ more like a multinational company. It has only 4.5 million people but a bureaucracy more suitable to a country with ten times the existing population.

9. Taxation reform

Reduce GST to the same rate as Australia, reduce the excise tax on cigarettes, scrap tax refunds like Working for Families which favour a certain few.

Rationale: keep it simple with a GST rate that is easy to calculate and apply, and does not act as a disincentive to consume (lower prices). Thresholds could be lowered from the $60,000 now to $30,000, bringing more into the tent who must pay GST.  With cigarettes, the poor have few pleasures and they're increasingly going to more harmful drugs, like meth and alcohol.

Then Working for Families sets poorer families with children apart, they are more favoured than anyone else. The young and childless along with the rich of any kind, subsidise the lower earners with kids. Here's a radical idea, how about not taxing that much to begin with and let people just get on and make their own choices. Hmm? Working for Families simply funds someone's TAB, booze and tobacco budget. It's cynical vote buying and both Labour and National are guilty.

10. Promote NZ 

Establish a 24 hour news service and broadcast on cable television in the USA and Europe. NZ has brilliant documentaries and newscasters, the rest of the world needs to see them, and they then learn and buy our stuff.

Rationale: most of the world forms its opinions from what they see on the TV and the rest of the world sees very little of NZ. The cost of setting this up could be quite cheap, just sell off TV2 as a commercial channel and put TV1, both state owned, onto the news and doco format. Or buy TV3 when they next go bust and do the same with them, sell of the profitable radio stations (or float them on the NZX) and put the TV3 channel over to news and doco. A deal could be struck with the excellent Maori Television for content.

11. Sport 

Get all children into sport, whether cross-country running or chess, what that sport is doesn't matter.

Rationale: When it comes to sporting potential, someone good at something finds the sport fun. NZ needs to find what children are good at and support them. Right now, finding that right sport is a grab bag of wrong-headed thinking.

Take every child from birth, blood test, register them then test at age 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18. Test for everything, then send them to the right class and the right school and the right sport.

NZ has many Steven Adams out there, I know as I played basketball alongside them, they need developing and promoting. Why is NZ not all over this?

12. Infrastructure

Build infrastructure and do not favour one sector over another.

Rationale: the Kaikoura earthquakes remind us how fixated NZ has become on one form of transport, in this case road transport. NZ was caught with its pants down, State Highway 1, the national road is blocked and now how to move stuff? Air is expensive, rail blocked as well and little or no coastal shipping. That is a serious headache for anyone living in the South Island.

But NZ can't just stop there; the sewer pipes will need replacing, bridges right across the nation are in the same boat as the sewer pipes. People may remember that when the rail network last went bust, the government subsequently got it up and running but had to put in a huge amount toward repair or replacement of the rail bridges. That work was due and rail is a lot older than the road network. By my calculation thousands of NZ's road bridges, which are largely managed by often poorly governed local authorities, will be due for major upgrade or replacement in about 20 years. This is an expenditure far more serious than the ballooning retired population. Being brutal about this, at least the oldies like me will one day die. But when those bridges collapse, that's it, NZ will be finished.

The chickens are coming home to roost, get those prisoners to work.

13. Maori

No more handouts via the treaty settlement process. Offer semi-autonomy to certain tribes.

Rationale: bulk fund the noisy tribes. See if they can hack it on their own. Don't allow them to raise taxes, an army, or conduct foreign policy, but let them be like Wales. Wales is part of the U.K. but still a principality.

The benefit for NZ would be winning first, second and third place at the Rugby World Cup. That wouldn't happen of course as the IRB would ban NZ, that kind of thinking is for the 'home' nations only (just joking, NZ'd win first, second, and third of both Rugby World Cups - Union and League). And think about two things, change the national anthem to be only sung in Maori, that way it sounds acceptable, and change the name of NZ to Aotearoa, initially Aotearoa New Zealand or Aotearoa Kiwiland. NZ'd enter the Olympics ahead of Australia, which is key I think.

New Zealand, why call a country New when it isn't, and Zealand when that's a territory in the Netherlands; a country that supposedly 'discovered' NZ but the discoverer didn't set foot on land, he ran away when the Maori killed one of his men for having the temerity to invade. Do you see my point? NZ is not Dutch and does not run away.

Kiwis are not that imaginative with names I know, hence Short Vly (sic) off the road between Blenheim and Nelson, at least the signwriter had a sense of humour. Plus too many Bull Creek, Small Creek, Long Valley, and of course the very imaginative North and South Island because New Ulster and New Munster was too complicated. Don't get me started on all those places called N****r something, usually called that after a black Labrador, which are traditionally called N****r (watch the Dambusters movie from the 50's if you don't believe me). When it comes to naming things, Kiwis are not at all imaginative, so Aotearoa makes a lot of sense as it's easy to use. Like Zimbabwe is better than Southern Rhodesia, though it's the bottom of the alphabet, but at least they dropped the name of a genocidal maniac.

14. Regional Development

Send government departments to the regions - disperse.

Rationale: this protects NZ in case of natural disaster by not concentrating services and spreads incomes, it means government would be cheaper. Along with Maori semi-autonomy, the regions get a boost from the employment and construction.

15. Health

Concentrate on day clinics and reach into schools and workplaces. Take healthcare to the masses, don't sit behind the desk at the hospital. Expand free healthcare to include basic orthodontic for children up to age 18 and dental surgery for adults once every four years. Free teeth cleaning annually.

Rationale: NZ is getting ever bigger hospitals and worse services. Reverse this by going small, locate clinics for same day procedures close to the people.

16. Police

Freeze the existing police budget but create a new force similar to the Federal police in Australia dealing with serious and international crime.

Rationale: drug dealers, precursor shippers, organised crime, internet scammers look out. The existing police do a good job at the lower level but they're out of their depth on the serious stuff. Arm these Federal police officers heavily and give them sweeping powers of arrest and seizure. That'd sort the gangs out, lock em up on sight; this is possible if you create a force with the powers to do so.

17. Retirement

Over the next decade the baby boomers will be retiring and they'll begin drawing on National Superannuation. This is really not a problem as they're investors and enterprising, they'll manage and so will NZ.

There is really nothing that needs to be done, apart from two innovations; look at retirement being on a sliding scale, paying less if retiring from age 60 (you can retire as early as 55 in Australia), or paying more from age 68. By taking bets like this, the government can smooth expenditure, some people who take a later retirement age (and more money) may actually die early and be no cost at all. Those going for early retirement would receive less over the subsequent 15 years, only catching up on those who retire at age 65 when they reach 75, again they may die before getting there.

The other problem is retirees are strongly incentivized to invest in rental housing as the capital gain is not taxed. There are peculiar whiz bang rules that make a genuine international portfolio of shares almost impossible for the small investor. By simply changing the rules to put capital gains from share investment onto the same footing as rental housing, as well as only paying tax on actual income from dividends, would diversify investors into stocks on the NYSE and Nasdaq and make retirement savers more independent and less vulnerable.

******

There you have it, follow this prescription and watch NZ take off. Right now it's sinking, sorry to have to tell you that, but it's true.

June 08, 2016

New Zealand Defence White Paper 2016

Finally we seem to be getting somewhere. Back in 2009 I made a submission toward the 2010 White Paper. It was ignored. But now with the latest effort, voices like mine seem to be getting through.

You can find a summary of what is proposed...>>HERE<<

* Tactical airlift - replace the current C130's - check. Proposed acquisition of C17's - check; they just need to add in four or so latest model C130's.

* No mention of adding air strike capability. The need to fly high and to strike is essential. Maybe they can acquire drones to do the job, fine if they can do that. Otherwise this is just another sop to the weak kneed.

* Air Surveillance - get rid of P-3 Orions - check. Replace with drones (UAV's) - check.

* Naval combat - replace Anzac frigates - check. Replace with patrol vessels - check. But they haven't addressed the need for amphibious operations and an ice breaker, preferring to go for ice strengthened only - shame that.

* Replace the oiler - check. Need more support - check.

* Network enabled and the ability to fight unconventionally - check.

* Update the army - check

Where I've said check, I covered these areas in my 2009 submission and they've gone for my suggestions. Did someone read my submission or was there so many people on about the same thing, they had to buckle?

But they're still slow and behind the times, right now I'd consider the following as well:-

1. Use fewer contractors and do more in-house. With threats emerging, conflict means the cost of using contractors escalates.

2. Submarines - patrol, observe, slip special forces ashore; the advanced technology, like that of the Japanese Soryu class, means we'd be silly not to investigate.

3. Ice breaker - a real one - C'mon

4. Air strike - essential.

5. Army - amphibious operations.

6. Give up the pretence of separate forces and go Marines.

Ken Horlor's Force

Army: amphibious brigade of marines (4,000 personnel), light armour;

Air force - UAV's and UCAV's (Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles) for surveillance, air and ground strike, latest 4 x C130's, 2 x C17's, (or alternatively an intermediate option, go with the the Kawasaki C-2 to do all airlift), helicopters as now (NH90's and Seasprite) but add 4 x heavier lift helicopters, lease replacements for 757's, such as 767 or similar.

Navy - 2 x amphibious warfare ships with landing dock and helicopter decks with hangars on each - with cruise missile etc., plus an ice breaker, patrol and support vessels but add 2 x submarines.


Like this...

Delete - Anzac frigates (2 of), C-130 Hercules (5), 757's (2), P-3 Orions (6), old oiler, support vessels.

Add - amphibious warfare ships (two to replace the frigates), six Kawasaki C-2's (to replace C-130's), four heavy lift helicopters (equivalent to Chinook), UAV's and UCAV's, two Soryu class submarines, add larger and more versatile oiler - standing in as patrol vessel as well, plus new role support vessel, then finally the all-important ice breaker.

Merge or demote - Canterbury multi-role vessel becomes a non-commissioned disaster relief ship, dive support and hydrographic merge to new single vessel.

I delete 18 units and add back in 23.

December 12, 2015

Flag Referendum Choice

The new flag has been chosen. It will now run off against the current NZ flag. Not bad for a country with no air strike capability and a navy that runs away from fishing boats. Grow some balls New Zealand, get a military before you change your flag.





August 28, 2015

New Rifle For NZ Army

Looks like the new rifle for the NZ military will be from the Lewis Machine and Tool Co., of Marion, Illinois. It isn't clear what actual weapon has been chosen, but the below firearms blog has some information...

>> New Zealand Army Selects LMT To Replace Steyr AUG <<

Is this company any good? It would be handy to know, please comment. The weapon the army has been trying looks like one in the embedded image.

A few other upgrades are in the process, including upgrades to NZ's two (yes you read that right) frigates. Why don't they just buy new Frigates? Four would do.