Showing posts with label Kamala Harris. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kamala Harris. Show all posts

January 21, 2026

Trump at Davos 2026

Donald Trump will be speaking at Davos, Switzerland, this Wednesday. No doubt he'll put the cat among the pigeons, but this got me thinking; is Donald J Trump really in charge, and if not, who is running the US?

Consider December 3, 2019, the date Kamala Harris announced she was withdrawing from the 2020 presidential election. According to official figures, she raised more than $40 million toward her campaign. That's a lot of money, and easily enough to continue into the Democratic Party primaries held in 2020. Personally, I believe that date in 2019 is a signpost to the fix being in, Joe Biden was to be the next president, and the most likely challenger, Bernie Sanders, was derailed, marginalised, and dismissed at every turn. Despite that, Sanders did rather well in the primaries, winning the largest state, California. 

Then, with Joe Biden installed and his running mate announced, in the form of Kamala Harris no less, he campaigned from his basement and won a clearly rigged election to become the 46th President of the US. The following four years were chaotic, and it was clear that Joe Biden was not in charge. He couldn't be, as he was clearly suffering from dementia. 

Then, leading into the 2024 presidential election, Donald Trump experienced several attempts on his life, one of which was nearly successful. This happened in Butler, Pennsylvania, and yet do you ever hear about this today? It is as if a cone of silence has descended over the issue; it is never to be discussed. However, Trump survived and became the 47th President. Is it clear that Donald J Trump is in charge? It isn't clear to me at all. Rather like Joe Biden, he appears to be managed too, with others making decisions on his behalf.

I'll cut to the chase: over the last few years, I believe we've been witnessing a power struggle between factions that actually run the US. The faction that now runs things was ultimately successful. What that means for the rest of the world is more disruption and change to the accepted rules. 

November 07, 2024

Trump's Quiet Support

The US Presidential election outcome shows that polling inflated Kamala Harris and badly represented support for Donald Trump. Was this intentional? I think this is likely, the polling companies were biased and wanted Kamala Harris to win. Then, there are the quiet Trump voters, people who wait and vote for Trump but who won't tell anyone about it.

Here's 270 to win's electoral college map:

https://www.270towin.com




November 05, 2024

No Toss Ups 2024

With the US Presidential election final results looming, here's the RealClearPolitics 'No Toss Ups' Electoral College map. I wonder if this will be accurate? The map is drawn from the cumulative polling for each candidate.

The map shows Trump/Vance in red with 287 votes, and Harris/Walz in blue with 251 votes. 270 Votes are needed to win the White House:

No Toss Ups 2024 RealClearPolitics


November 04, 2024

Has Kamala Harris Conceded?

 At a recent campaign rally in Michigan, Kamala Harris promised to do everything in her power to end the war in Gaza. This is a rather strange promise to make, seeing as she's the sitting Vice President right now, so she could do something right now! But she won't, now or in the future as her statement isn't about Gaza, it's about optics and her own future, outside of the White House.

October 20, 2024

Media Collusion?

 Why did the media describe the Kamala Harris interview by Fox News exactly the same way?

October 12, 2024

Trump v Harris Electoral College Map

The race to the White House appears closer than many imagined. Below is a link to the RealClearPolitics Electoral College map:

https://www.realclearpolling.com/maps/president/2024/toss-up/electoral-college

You can select 'Create Your Own Map' and then play around based on your own assumptions and current polling. One interesting feature: you can select 'No Toss Ups' and by doing this you can see that Trump is ahead. However, if the result is close in those critical toss up states, then I say rigging comes into play and that may see Kamala Harris win the race.

I've speculated about why the 'powers-that-be' want Trump dead, and I still think it's because of his apparent instability. Trump's politics are not that out of step with those of the cabal running things, think Operation Warp Speed and Israel as examples.

Kamala Harris is not the left-wing person her critics claim, I cannot find any policies of hers, or anything in her past which may indicate that; she's quite conservative in fact, and I place her slightly to the right of New Zealand's Judith 'Crusher' Collins in terms of her personal political opinions. For those not familiar, 'Crusher' Collins was the former leader on the National Party in NZ. She earned the crusher tag when she threatened to crush boy racers cars. In recent years she's gone soft, and I will not be surprised if she soon says the sinking of the NZ Navy vessel after it hit a reef off Samoa, was a win/win, as the biodiversity of the reef has been strengthened, and who needs hydrographic anyway? I cannot see Kamala Harris going soft.


October 02, 2024

Where I Fit Politically

I took a test to place me in terms of where I sit in relation to US politics, and here's the result. Are you surprised at all?

This is where the US Presidential candidates sit:


2024 US Presidential Candidates
2024 US Presidential Candidates

When political pundits say how far left Kamala Harris is, well, she's not that left actually. In terms of politics, she's closer to New Zealand's Judith 'Crusher' Collins.

Here's where I sit: I'm centrist, and more libertarian than authoritarian. Note, I'm farther to the left than Kamala Harris, but not as far left as Jill Stein.

Me Closer To Jill Stein



September 13, 2024

Trump v Harris Debate: Who Won?

I find this somewhat surprising, according to C-Span's post debate poll, 73.9% of respondents think Trump won:

https://x.com/cspan/status/1833698715841724887

Meanwhile, Victor Davis Hanson thinks ABC won the debate:

September 11, 2024

Debate: Kamala Harris v Donald Trump

I watched most of the debate tonight and my honest reaction is I found it somewhat boring. I'll sum it up as Donald Trump saying how good things were under him and don't you all want those good times again, against Kamala Harris saying how good things will be under her and aren't I so pretty, everyone can see that, let's all use word salad to make me look as if I know what I'm talking about.

I don't think anyone will change their minds about either candidate. But, what of the undecided voter? It occurred to me they may stay away and not vote at all. 

Was the debate conducted by ABC incredibly biased? Yes, of course it was, that was to be expected. In an era of gross censorship and an unverified cabal running things, who would think any differently?

Are the current polls accurate? These are likely biased as well. It comes down to how questions are asked and the order in which questions are posed. This is the way pollsters 'force' certain candidates and opinions on people. When looking at the result of a public opinion poll, media will say something opaque; an example: 65% of all women over 35 believe that 90% of men did this or that. What I've just done there is frame a statement whereby you are forced to believe that women view men one way or the other, even though, technically, I haven't said that at all. 

So, either Donald Trump is way ahead and will win by a lot, or he's not in which case Kamala Harris will win by a nose. Of course, rigging does go on, especially in the vital swing states. Looking at the current Electoral College map, it appears Pennsylvania and North Carolina are critical battlegrounds.

September 07, 2024

Nate Silver Predicts Trump Win?

Currently, Kamala Harris is ahead in most polls concerning the critical battleground states, but the trend is going the way of Trump, meaning Harris is losing ground and likely to lose by election day.

https://www.natesilver.net/p/the-electoral-college-bias-has-returned

Kamala Harris and Donald Trump go head-to-head in a televised debate screened nationwide on Tuesday. This may determine the race.

August 31, 2024

Communism Defined

Just a quick guidance for those wondering what the near future will be like: 





August 30, 2024

US Presidential Elections and the Electoral College

Over the next few weeks there will be a lot of talk about the national polling for the two big candidates for the US Presidential elections. A lot of this is meaningless as the popular vote does not count. What counts are the Electoral College and critical battleground States.

The following are the main toss up or swing states this time round:

Nevada, Arizona, Georgia, North Carolina, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin. 

These states are either complete toss ups or they lean a little one way of the other, but that lead could be easily overturned. That's a total of 106 Electoral College votes up for grabs, and the road to 270 Electoral College votes does not require all of them to be won for either Kamala Harris or Donald Trump. Each candidate by now, should be exclusively concentrating on these states. Running various permutations and for Trump, Pennsylvania is looking really important.

Of course, if it appears that Harris will lose, expect anything to happen, the current cabal running things in Washington DC will be that desperate to hold on to power, they'll be prepared to do anything. We've already seen what they're capable of.


August 28, 2024

Choice: Kamala Harris vs Trump/RFK Jr

The 2024 election to decide who will be US President brings to the fore the stark choice: whether to vote for Big Tech censorship, Big Pharma profiteering and war after war, or with Trump, bluster, grandstanding, and a lot of golf being played. together with RFK Jr chasing Anthony Fauci around Washington DC.

I know which I'd prefer; jail time for Fauci and golf. 

Democratic Party voters need to ask themselves whose side they're on, do they stand for commonsense and right vs wrong, or the machine politics by the backers of Kamala Harris.


August 26, 2024

RFK Jr Deal With Trump

RFK Jr reveals to Fox News that he will step aside in the 10 swing states but stay off the ballot in states where his presence will not change the outcome. Furthermore, he mentions that he does not have a promise of any role within a Trump administration.


August 25, 2024

August 20, 2024

What's Going On?

This may sound a bit incoherent, but I'm thinking out loud here, so please bear with me. One of the reasons I've shelved the writing of my book about the thing back in 2020, is that there's been a lot going on and recent events have changed my perspective. What I believe is that we are looking at something much worse than the Scamdemic on its own. 'They' have exposed themselves.

My usual default setting is to look for the money. When you boil it right down, almost everything is about money. Greed is one of man's great failings. Conmen exploit this failing, and the best conmen become very rich, and then they're knighted and become revered as soothsayers and truthtellers. 

While I think what is going on is about money, I don't think it is only about money. I think it is also about power and avoiding going to jail. I'll explain this by walking backwards; from recent events, back in time to when I believe events took a drastically dark turn, meaning since then, almost everything we believe to be true is actually false.

Let's begin with the attempted assassination of Donald Trump. It is obvious to anyone with an IQ above 80, that the powers-that-be tried to kill Trump. They missed, and hence we see Kamala Harris installed as the Democratic Party nominee for the US Presidency, replacing Joe Biden. This was a swift pivot, well executed and accompanied by the mainstream media demoting any talk of the attempted assassination and the exaltation of Harris as heir apparent. Not only that, we also have Ukraine invading Russia, and Israel increasing its actions in Gaza. I think all of the latter events relate to the attempted assassination of Trump.

Basically, the powers-that-be do not want Donald Trump in the White House. I'm presuming that while he's part of the club, he isn't seen as a safe pair of hands. He's too uncontrollable. Alex Jones may be right, he has said Tump will not live to the end of the year.

What has Covid got to do with this? Everything, as it turns out. Was there even a virus? Possibly, I like Bret Weinstein's explanation of this; that the USA was funding gain of function research in Wuhan, and manipulating bat viruses to create bioweapons. There was a leak from the laboratory, and many people died. 

This leak was exploited by the powers-that-be to manipulate the outcome of elections in 2020. The lockdowns, postal voting etc., were done so the US Presidential elections could be rigged. A practise run was held in New Zealand that same year, its election rigging was successful and so the US followed suit.

This sounds far-fetched, right? 

Before that, in 2019 Jeffrey Epstein was found hanged in his cell. He had to die, he knew too much. You may see the exposure of his operation as serendipitous. Simply by accident, we got to see something we were never meant to see. The Deep State was exploiting attractive young women, and luring in the great, the rich and important men and then blackmailing them. I speculate that this operation was about skewing scientific research, obtaining the right political decisions, wars, assassinations, effective control.

I believe the power structures exposed as a result of the Jeffrey Epstein matter, are the same as those that rigged the elections in 2020 and which by intent or simply by accident, released the virus in Wuhan. This is the same power structure that tried to kill Donald Trump, and which will be prepared to wreck the global economy, institute martial law, cause mass panic and ultimately start World War III. 

Russia knows this and is fighting back. It explains their invasion of Ukraine. They're securing their part of the world.

To continue our walk backwards, we arrive at the GFC 2007-2008. Nothing was really done about that. All that happened were that governments, central banks and financial institutions doubled down and handed out performance bonuses. No-one went to jail, there were a few movies made, some people lost everything but life at the top just carried on. I believe subsequent events are linked to the GFC, and that the powers-that-be will be prepared to kill millions and even start WWIII to avoid accountability.

But wait, there's more: when did all this start and when did these dark forces first fully reveal themselves? I believe that event was the assassination of US President, John F Kennedy in Dallas, Texas on the 22nd of November, 1963. This was a shot that did not miss. Just as with Trump, the dark forces had to get rid of Kennedy. Then, later they shot his brother as he was running to be president. 

Think about all the US Presidents since then. Lyndon Johnson was sworn in immediately after JFK was shot, but he didn't run in 1968. He was replaced by Richard Nixon who was set up and forced to resign, but before that his deputy, Spiro Agnew was forced to resign. That meant Gerald Ford became President in the 1970's and yet no-one had voted for him. 

All the way down the line since the assassination of JFK, I wouldn't be surprised to find that every president has been appointed. Think about the way George W Bush came into office, he had actually lost the election to Al Gore, but the Supreme Court saw it differently. Barack Obama, is that even his real name? His classmates at Columbia University struggle to remember him (he has reinvented himself and exaggerated his achievements The embedded NYT's article is from 2007, when there was more questioning of Obama's backstory. He was at Columbia for three years, and then he worked in New York, but when talking about himself he gives this period a once over lightly. What was he really up to during this period?). 

The election in 2016 was meant to be a march to victory for Hillary Clinton, she's a safe pair of hands and very much part of what I'm categorising as the powers-that-be. But, they got it wrong, their level of rigging was ineffective and the man who should not be President got himself elected. If you recall 2016 and election night, Donald Trump seemed surprised he'd won. I was in the US in 2016 and outside of places like California, the groundswell of support for Trump was obvious. Washington DC likely had little idea of this level of support. They live within the beltway, in a bubble of their own. And so, Trump came to power and he didn't obey all the rules. He had to go, and so everything from 2020 on is related to the need to get rid of him. We saw this in plain sight as a bullet clipped his ear.

Now, care needs to be taken to avoid trying to link everything since the election of JFK in 1960. There are bad actors and coincidences. Therefore, I cannot see a link with 9/11. The only link I can see is that Osama bin Laden was initially funded by the US in the 1980's. He fought for Afghanistan following its invasion by the Soviet Union. But, he followed his own agenda and soon became an enemy of the West.

Who are the powers-that-be? I like to think of them as a committee issuing orders or directives. Every OECD country takes orders from them. The powers-that-be will be a cabal of industrialists, financiers, military, intelligence community, technology, and so on. Politicians are their bootlickers, toadies, and politicians throughout the OECD only get 'elected' by being appointed. 

You may say this is outrageous, but I ask you to look at these leaders: Joe Biden is senile and clearly not running anything. I mean - c'mon.

But then look at who else: Canada - Justin Trudeau, he's a nasty little prick. New Zealand - Christopher Luxon looks like a timeshare salesman from the 1990's and sounds like one. Australia - Anthony Albanese comes across as a lower level clerk. United Kingdom - Keir Starmer a weak and ineffectual man who hates the working class. France - Emmanuel Macron a slithering eel, ewww. 

We can just go on and on about who is supposedly leading the developed world, and the cumulative weight of these people wouldn't have enough grunt to pull the skin off a rice pudding. I put it to my dear readers, the only reason they're in office is because they're good at taking orders or the powers-that-be have something on them.

I'm afraid I do not have a solution to the predicament we find ourselves in. 'They' revealed themselves in 1963, that's when the coup happened. Then, by accident we saw part of the structure with Jeffrey Epstein, and then in 2020 and again with the shot that grazed Donald Trump's ear. We experienced the ramping up of the war in Vietnam, the invasion of Iraq, the GFC, the Scamdemic, and rigged elections. So, this isn't some benign force that has your best interests at heart. 

I'll just leave it there for now, please leave your comments.

July 29, 2024

Race to 270

The link below takes you to an interactive map showing how many Electoral College votes are required to win the US Presidential election. You can play around with it yourself, the key being to get to 270 votes to win. 270 votes wins the Presidential race.

https://www.270towin.com

In default mode, it is a bit generous toward the Democratic candidate. As things stand right now, it gives 229 votes to Kamala Harris and 251 to Donald Trump.

The key battlegrounds for Kamala Harris are: Nevada, Arizona, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Georgia. If she picks up all of these, then she wins comfortably.

Donald Trump has much less work to do.


July 25, 2024

Kamala Harris v Donald Trump

I'm noticing the rank hypocrisy of right-of-centre commentators criticising Kamala Harris for any reason, while ignoring the obvious failings of Donald J Trump. The worst form a criticism being levelled at Kamala Harris amounts to nothing more than slut-shaming. So, let's balance this up and have an objective look at both main candidates for the US Presidential elections in November.

Kamala Harris, at 59 seems youthful compared to Donald Trump, and for that matter, youthful compared to the current President who suffers dementia. She's intelligent, a lawyer and someone who has held high office; she's never lost an election. Her path to the top is by way of District Attorney, Attorney-General of California, US Senator for California and now Vice President of the United States. She's been married the once and remains married to this day. As a politician, she is fairly conservative and considered a safe pair of hands. On a personal level, she's self-made; and both parents were immigrants.

Donald Trump received a sound education at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. He inherited part of his father, Fred Trump's massive wealth which was amassed by owning something like 30,000 apartments in New York. Donald Trump took his father's wealth and made it go backwards. That's right, had the Donald invested wisely, he'd be the richest man alive today. He has several company failures to his credit. His record as a politician is mixed, he won his first effort by winning in the all-important Electoral College despite losing the overall popular vote to Hillary Clinton. His second effort resulted in failure, he lost in the Electoral College this time. The result in 2020 has been justifiably criticised, but it should be noted that Donald Trump was the sitting President and therefore, in the best position to do something about all that rigging. 

Donald Trump implemented Operation Warp Speed, which has resulted in the death and injury of millions. This should never be forgotten.

What chance does each have? As things stand right now, my analysis sees Donald Trump ahead in the Electoral College. There are 538 votes available in 2024, meaning 270 votes are required to secure the Presidency. I have Donald Trump with 363 and Kamala Harris with 175. Thus, Kamala Harris has to pick up 95 votes to win. 

This is where it gets interesting. After the outpouring of sympathy for Donald Trump following the attempt on his life, the Democratic Party pivoted swiftly and got rid of the very old, pale stale male, Joe Biden. He's still President for now, but Kamala Harris may only be minutes away from ascending the throne, without an election. She attracts a different demographic; college educated women, Afro-Americans and Asians. This could be enough to see her win key battleground states. Take Georgia, currently considered leaning Trump, its population is 32% Afro-American. Another battleground state is Pennsylvania, made up of 12% Afro-Americans, and 31% of women there have a bachelor's degree or higher. 

If she wins those two states, she's now 60 votes away from the prize. All those key swing states have demographics more aligned to Harris than Joe Biden. Donald Trump should be worried, and he is judging by the attack ads that suddenly appeared.

Will RFK Jr have an impact, the way Ross Perot did back in the 90's? He'll attract the college educated and freer thinking voters, but my guess is they're in states that already heavily lean to Kamala Harris, and he won't overturn the result as she's so far out in front anyway. But, who knows, I'm ready to accept RFK Jr may cause an upset. It'd be interesting to see him holding enough Electoral College votes to prevent 270 being reached by either Harris or Trump.

Another factor is how the deep state, swamp creatures and assorted authoritarians view the two main contenders. I believe, the reason they tried to kill Donald Trump was not because he isn't part of the swamp - he very much is - but that he's seen as unpredictable. The swamp likes Kamala Harris as she's likely to be reliable. 

Those dismissing Kamala Harris are getting things badly wrong in my opinion. 


July 23, 2024

Kamala Harris in November

We need a bit of honesty when talking about Kamala Harris and her chances of beating Donald Trump in an honest contest. Let's face it, she is good looking. Why does no-one ever point this out? Research has been done on the good-looks in politics factor, and the findings are that you can accurately predict the outcome based on who is the better looking. It's a shame I know, why should looks matter? But the reality is looks do matter and Kamala Harris is better looking than Gretchen Whitmer, who people do say is good looking. I said good looking a lot, algorithms. Heh 

July 22, 2024

Joe Biden

Joe Biden is not seeking reelection as President of the United States, he's stepped down as the Democratic nominee for the election in November. Now, the pressure will mount for him to resign as President and allow Kamala Harris to become the first female POTUS and first woman-of-color as well. If he doesn't resign, he'll go down in history as an old fashioned misogynist. C'mon Joe, be part of history.