Arrests May Be Coming

Related to Russiagate - arrests may be imminent

Critical Infrastructure

For a lot of people, this will be hard to listen to. What Mike Benz does is describe how the lie that was Russiagate was weaponised effectively, resulting in the conspiracy that resulted in the years-long coup to undermine Donald J Trump from late 2016, and potentially up to the present day.

What happened is that elections were added to the concept of critical infrastructure, meaning the deep state could say that in censoring free speech, or outright rigging elections, they were protecting this infrastructure.

I hope I've got this right, correct me if I've got this wrong.

It looks as if arrests will be made, I wonder who?

What's Going On?

This may sound a bit incoherent, but I'm thinking out loud here, so please bear with me. One of the reasons I've shelved the writing of my book about the thing back in 2020, is that there's been a lot going on and recent events have changed my perspective. What I believe is that we are looking at something much worse than the Scamdemic on its own. 'They' have exposed themselves.

My usual default setting is to look for the money. When you boil it right down, almost everything is about money. Greed is one of man's great failings. Conmen exploit this failing, and the best conmen become very rich, and then they're knighted and become revered as soothsayers and truthtellers. 

While I think what is going on is about money, I don't think it is only about money. I think it is also about power and avoiding going to jail. I'll explain this by walking backwards; from recent events, back in time to when I believe events took a drastically dark turn, meaning since then, almost everything we believe to be true is actually false.

Let's begin with the attempted assassination of Donald Trump. It is obvious to anyone with an IQ above 80, that the powers-that-be tried to kill Trump. They missed, and hence we see Kamala Harris installed as the Democratic Party nominee for the US Presidency, replacing Joe Biden. This was a swift pivot, well executed and accompanied by the mainstream media demoting any talk of the attempted assassination and the exaltation of Harris as heir apparent. Not only that, we also have Ukraine invading Russia, and Israel increasing its actions in Gaza. I think all of the latter events relate to the attempted assassination of Trump.

Basically, the powers-that-be do not want Donald Trump in the White House. I'm presuming that while he's part of the club, he isn't seen as a safe pair of hands. He's too uncontrollable. Alex Jones may be right, he has said Tump will not live to the end of the year.

What has Covid got to do with this? Everything, as it turns out. Was there even a virus? Possibly, I like Bret Weinstein's explanation of this; that the USA was funding gain of function research in Wuhan, and manipulating bat viruses to create bioweapons. There was a leak from the laboratory, and many people died. 

This leak was exploited by the powers-that-be to manipulate the outcome of elections in 2020. The lockdowns, postal voting etc., were done so the US Presidential elections could be rigged. A practise run was held in New Zealand that same year, its election rigging was successful and so the US followed suit.

This sounds far-fetched, right? 

Before that, in 2019 Jeffrey Epstein was found hanged in his cell. He had to die, he knew too much. You may see the exposure of his operation as serendipitous. Simply by accident, we got to see something we were never meant to see. The Deep State was exploiting attractive young women, and luring in the great, the rich and important men and then blackmailing them. I speculate that this operation was about skewing scientific research, obtaining the right political decisions, wars, assassinations, effective control.

I believe the power structures exposed as a result of the Jeffrey Epstein matter, are the same as those that rigged the elections in 2020 and which by intent or simply by accident, released the virus in Wuhan. This is the same power structure that tried to kill Donald Trump, and which will be prepared to wreck the global economy, institute martial law, cause mass panic and ultimately start World War III. 

Russia knows this and is fighting back. It explains their invasion of Ukraine. They're securing their part of the world.

To continue our walk backwards, we arrive at the GFC 2007-2008. Nothing was really done about that. All that happened were that governments, central banks and financial institutions doubled down and handed out performance bonuses. No-one went to jail, there were a few movies made, some people lost everything but life at the top just carried on. I believe subsequent events are linked to the GFC, and that the powers-that-be will be prepared to kill millions and even start WWIII to avoid accountability.

But wait, there's more: when did all this start and when did these dark forces first fully reveal themselves? I believe that event was the assassination of US President, John F Kennedy in Dallas, Texas on the 22nd of November, 1963. This was a shot that did not miss. Just as with Trump, the dark forces had to get rid of Kennedy. Then, later they shot his brother as he was running to be president. 

Think about all the US Presidents since then. Lyndon Johnson was sworn in immediately after JFK was shot, but he didn't run in 1968. He was replaced by Richard Nixon who was set up and forced to resign, but before that his deputy, Spiro Agnew was forced to resign. That meant Gerald Ford became President in the 1970's and yet no-one had voted for him. 

All the way down the line since the assassination of JFK, I wouldn't be surprised to find that every president has been appointed. Think about the way George W Bush came into office, he had actually lost the election to Al Gore, but the Supreme Court saw it differently. Barack Obama, is that even his real name? His classmates at Columbia University struggle to remember him (he has reinvented himself and exaggerated his achievements The embedded NYT's article is from 2007, when there was more questioning of Obama's backstory. He was at Columbia for three years, and then he worked in New York, but when talking about himself he gives this period a once over lightly. What was he really up to during this period?). 

The election in 2016 was meant to be a march to victory for Hillary Clinton, she's a safe pair of hands and very much part of what I'm categorising as the powers-that-be. But, they got it wrong, their level of rigging was ineffective and the man who should not be President got himself elected. If you recall 2016 and election night, Donald Trump seemed surprised he'd won. I was in the US in 2016 and outside of places like California, the groundswell of support for Trump was obvious. Washington DC likely had little idea of this level of support. They live within the beltway, in a bubble of their own. And so, Trump came to power and he didn't obey all the rules. He had to go, and so everything from 2020 on is related to the need to get rid of him. We saw this in plain sight as a bullet clipped his ear.

Now, care needs to be taken to avoid trying to link everything since the election of JFK in 1960. There are bad actors and coincidences. Therefore, I cannot see a link with 9/11. The only link I can see is that Osama bin Laden was initially funded by the US in the 1980's. He fought for Afghanistan following its invasion by the Soviet Union. But, he followed his own agenda and soon became an enemy of the West.

Who are the powers-that-be? I like to think of them as a committee issuing orders or directives. Every OECD country takes orders from them. The powers-that-be will be a cabal of industrialists, financiers, military, intelligence community, technology, and so on. Politicians are their bootlickers, toadies, and politicians throughout the OECD only get 'elected' by being appointed. 

You may say this is outrageous, but I ask you to look at these leaders: Joe Biden is senile and clearly not running anything. I mean - c'mon.

But then look at who else: Canada - Justin Trudeau, he's a nasty little prick. New Zealand - Christopher Luxon looks like a timeshare salesman from the 1990's and sounds like one. Australia - Anthony Albanese comes across as a lower level clerk. United Kingdom - Keir Starmer a weak and ineffectual man who hates the working class. France - Emmanuel Macron a slithering eel, ewww. 

We can just go on and on about who is supposedly leading the developed world, and the cumulative weight of these people wouldn't have enough grunt to pull the skin off a rice pudding. I put it to my dear readers, the only reason they're in office is because they're good at taking orders or the powers-that-be have something on them.

I'm afraid I do not have a solution to the predicament we find ourselves in. 'They' revealed themselves in 1963, that's when the coup happened. Then, by accident we saw part of the structure with Jeffrey Epstein, and then in 2020 and again with the shot that grazed Donald Trump's ear. We experienced the ramping up of the war in Vietnam, the invasion of Iraq, the GFC, the Scamdemic, and rigged elections. So, this isn't some benign force that has your best interests at heart. 

I'll just leave it there for now, please leave your comments.

Obama: Russia Hacked

President Obama is saying that Russia influenced the outcome of the Presidential election by hacking both the Republican and Democratic party emails; the Democratic emails were then released to damage the prospects of Hillary Clinton, the presidential candidate for the Democrats.

Hands up anyone who believes this?

Let's see the evidence. It isn't too much to ask, surely. Maybe an independent hacker could look at the evidence and issue a report, and let it be known who this hacker is so we can all see they have the expertise.

Putin must be sitting there grinning from ear to ear. It's like he found a discarded lottery ticket and found he's a major winner. Imagine your competitor insists on making it very well known how clever you are. That's the barb Putin has to endure every day (irony). Someone, please tell President Obama to silence, he's meant to be managing a graceful exit and right now he's looking like a chump.

Donald Trump Next US President

It looks like Donald Trump has won the race to the White House. What an upset, the pollsters will have to review their methods as they got it badly wrong - again. 

If we're going to be honest, Hillary Clinton lost two weeks ago when her campaign stalled and she lost all momentum. It wasn't the FBI investigation or Wikileaks, it was her approach to campaigning that cost her victory. 

Hillary Clinton treats her campaign like a parade to victory. She swans around the place, gracing the masses with her presence. Meanwhile her opponents roll their sleeves up and ask the voters to back them, that they'll effect change for them. Which message or approach sounds better? She stalled against Obama, and now Trump too.

Trump was backed by what I call angry pick-up truck man. On my recent visit to the USA I saw them everywhere with their Trump/Pence bumper stickers. They sit behind the wheel of their trucks looking very pissed off. These angry, mostly white men, were going to vote come what may. They'd remember to vote no matter what. Contrast that with Hillary, I didn't see any evidence of her campaign apart from television attack ads. Lame.

DNC Leak 2

Wikileaks have released more of the hacked Democratic emails. Latest reports show collusion between mainstream media and the Democratic campaign (CNN, no surprise really, everyone knew this went on), and that the Putin link to the hack was fabricated.

FBI Renew Investigation of Hillary Clinton

Reading between the lines, it looks like the FBI have got their noses out of joint. It may be that the new emails they've discovered don't cross-reference with what Hillary has already provided them. Oh dear, if that's the case, she may face obstruction charges or worse. This is a gift to the Trump campaign.

Hillary Clinton Losing Momentum

I don't know if this is being correctly reported but in case no-one has noticed; Hillary Clinton has lost the momentum in the race for the Presidency. She's fallen behind in Florida by 2 percentage points and in other polls she's now tied or only marginally ahead. Trump was lagging badly only a week ago but now he's gaining ground. His campaign while disorganised on some levels, appears to be judging its sprint to the line better, with Hillary appearing out of gas. Is this another Hillary Clinton choke (like she choked against Obama)?

Trump Campaign

If the outlandish statements Donald Trump is making are not because he has decided he doesn't want to be President, then maybe the strategy is to set the bar so low to begin with, that he can now soften and not seem weak. The bonus is the Clinton camp are now talking about Trump a lot, which is akin to free advertising for Trump. The race is certainly not over yet, and Trump may win. A factor overlooked is all those voters who don't want to see Bill back in the White House.

Warren Buffett to Donald Trump:

'Have you no sense of decency?'

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/warren-buffett-to-donald-trump-have-you-no-sense-of-decency-2016-08-01

While introducing Hillary Clinton at a presidential campaign rally in Omaha, Nebraska, on Monday, billionaire Warren Buffett challenged Donald Trump over his war of words with the family of a fallen Muslim U.S. soldier. "I ask Donald Trump: 'Have you no sense of decency, sir?'"

Start viewing the following video from the 7:00 minute mark to get the sound bite (or listen to the entire speech, it is worth it):-