Showing posts with label ACT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ACT. Show all posts

March 19, 2024

Newshub Bailout Looms?

I've been closely following statements by New Zealand cabinet ministers, about the plight of TV3's News operation and its planned shutdown by Warner Bros. Discovery. It's looking increasingly likely that this private company will be getting a taxpayer funded bailout. It makes my blood boil.

These were people who championed lockdowns and the jab. They're the lowest of the low. 

This latest government hasn't been in office very long, so it's about time they learnt to read the room. TV3 are loathed by the majority of the people. Bail them out at your peril as if you do, your re-election chances will plummet. Use taxpayer funds to deliver long awaited improvements to the country's infrastructure instead. 

Just watch the outrage if Newshub gets bailed out 

November 27, 2023

ACT in the New Zealand Government

ACT leader, David Seymour makes a lot of sense here, if this is the direction of New Zealand over the next three years, then all good. My problem with David Seymour, however, is he was all pro-jab and authoritarian during the Wellington protests. Has he turned over a new leaf? We'll see, eh.

November 25, 2023

National/ACT/NZ First Coalition Agreements

Here are the full coalition agreements for the incoming National/ACT/NZ First government of New Zealand:

National and New Zealand First https://assets.nationbuilder.com/nationalparty/pages/18466/attachments/original/1700778597/NZFirst_Agreement_2.pdf?1700778597

National and ACT https://assets.nationbuilder.com/nationalparty/pages/18466/attachments/original/1700778592/National_ACT_Agreement.pdf?1700778592

There is a lot to unpack here and so I'm going to think about it before commenting. It does look positive though, it appears Winston Peters has delivered.

October 17, 2023

New Zealand Election 2023 Result

Those interested in the results of the New Zealand General Election 2023 can find the full information here:

https://www.electionresults.govt.nz/electionresults_2023_preliminary/

Be careful following the mainstream media as they are full of it and often wrong in their assessment. Right now, National have a paper thin majority, which is likely to evaporate after special votes are counted. That means NZ First are back and able to bring some sanity to Parliament.

The problem hasn't been solved though. The NZ Parliament still kept us locked up under lockdown despite having done no wrong, and they tried to kill or injure us with the poisonous jab. So, National and ACT are not to be trusted any more than the other bunch of criminals.

For useful links about just how bad the poisonous jab is, see this page full of information to open your eyes with: https://kenhorlor.blogspot.com/p/interesting-links.html

Oh and now that timely graphic:




September 03, 2023

Election Season 2023

My reaction to the mainstream parties courting my vote this year. Yeah...nah.




August 27, 2023

Did Hipkins Just Blow It?

I believe New Zealand Prime Minister, Chris Hipkins just blew the 2023 election. He's announced he won't deal with Winston Peters and NZ First after the polls close. 

This is a big mistake as the effect must be to drive Labour voters away to NZ First. That's because the Labour voters won't want to see National and ACT running the country alone. If Labour voters switch to NZ First, they have the chance to put a stop to National's excesses by making Peters as powerful as possible within Parliament. 

No doubt Hipkins is thinking the opposite, that by ruling NZ First out the Labour support will return to him and stop playing footsie with Winston Peters. But that overlooks the past few years and the pain his policies have caused. A far better approach would be to say; he'd look at the results after the polls close and then consider who to deal with. 

But, with the approach he's taking, people remember the pain and back NZ First to be a handbrake on National/ACT.

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/496678/instability-and-chaos-labour-rules-out-a-partnership-with-nz-first

Labour leader Chris Hipkins has ruled out New Zealand First as a possible coalition partner after this year's election, saying Winston Peters and his party would cause "instability and chaos".

Labour leader Chris Hipkins confirmed the decision at a media conference today.

"New Zealand First has become a party more interested in toilets than the issues that matter most to New Zealanders," said Hipkins.

February 10, 2022

Rodney Hide Behind Protestors 100%

Former New Zealand ACT party leader, Rodney hide has penned this moving support for anti-mandate protests, and scolds current ACT party leader for his backing of lockdowns and mandates in general:

https://www.bassettbrashandhide.com/post/i-support-the-protest-100-percent

"And to ask you to consider this: what do you expect people to do when their rights are trampled and their lives destroyed while politicians not only refuse to meet with them but belittle them when they protest?

My answer is to fight."

October 18, 2020

New Zealand General Election 2020: What Just Happened?

In simple terms, the centre-right of the political spectrum in New Zealand have been slaughtered. That's the polite way of describing the outcome of the 2020 General Election. Labour can govern alone, they gained 49.1% of the party vote and 64 seats in the house.

Before I drill down into some specifics, the way I see Labour achieving their stunning victory was through two significant shifts among voters. The first was the flight of NZ First back to Labour. I'd describe 60% of NZ First as old Labour; retired unionists and blue collar workers. They returned to the fold and NZ First are no longer represented in parliament. Then more significantly, middle class and upper middle class voters ditched the National party and voted Labour for the first time. They voted against their class interests and I believe they'll suffer because of it, but more of how and why below.

Let's examine two formerly safe National seats for a snapshot of what I'm talking about; Ilam in the city of Christchurch and the rural Canterbury seat of Rangitata in the South Island.

Ilam is about as "blue" as it gets. About 20% of houses in Ilam are owned by a family trust and 30% of people there earn more than $100,000 a year. Half the population of Ilam are professionals or managers. They drive cars bought new, not old import secondhand ones. A decent house will cost more than a million dollars. Right, that said, they've now elected a Labour member of parliament, who will enjoy a 2,200 vote majority. The previous incumbent, Gerry Brownlee had held the seat for National its entire existence and last election he had a majority of over 8,000 votes. That's nearly an 11,000 vote turnaround in just three years. If you'd told me this and I didn't know otherwise, I'd say you're dreaming. More like a nightmare actually, that's how bad that result is. And Labour won the all-important party vote in Ilam for the first time, by a stunning 4,800 over National. 

Then to the rich farmlands of Rangitata. Rich, yes, they're not struggling farmers from this rich region in Canterbury. The farmers of Rangitata have got millions in equity in their farms and some are known to buy a brand new tractor every year. The electorate traditionally doesn't know what the Labour party is, well it does now as it has a Labour MP with a 3,400 vote majority. Three years ago National had the majority with 6,300 votes. That's another stunning reversal. Now, it could be said that as this electorate incorporates Timaru and Temuka that it does include working class. And I'd agree but its close neighbours, Waitaki and Selwyn which are far more conservative also lost the party vote to Labour.

To those voters who changed sides, do you realise what you've just done? You've effectively given Labour the right to tax you out of existence. Labour will not protect you. Your business, your house, your income, your property portfolio will no longer be off-limits.

Why did these middle class and upper-middle class voters switch and vote Labour? It has to be the Jacinda Ardern factor. As Labour leader she better reflects the NZ electorate. NZ society has changed and traditional Christian values are no longer paramount. These former National voters have been duped in effect, by niceness and messages of inclusivity. Of course, they'll flip back to the right when their bank accounts are impacted, but by then it may too late.

The Greens polled about where they usually do. In the past they've been as high as 11% with leaders' Russel Norman and Metiria Turei, so their 7.6% of the party vote is middle of the road. They did win the seat of Auckland Central and no doubt the Greens will rejoice, but Auckland Central is a bit flaky and so the result, while surprising, was not beyond the realms of possibility.

ACT are a little more to the right than National and they picked up 8% of the party vote, likely largely from National voters trying to shore up the right. That's good for them and at least we'll have a strong alternative centre/right voice in parliament. This was the best ever result for ACT and they have the opportunity now to push on and increase this further. They'll need discipline and hard work.

Where to from here? National need to do a complete rethink. They need to get back to their rural and affluent suburban base and ask important questions. Why? And don't lurch to the right or go toward evangelical Christians because that'd be a disaster, clearly societal changes mean people are quite happy with the looser morals of Labour (and the Greens for that matter). No knee-jerk reactions, the way forward has to be thought through. But something that is immediately needed, and that is a clean-out of the dead wood, top to bottom. Party organisational hierarchies have been around forever, the National party needs a new broom to sweep the place clean.

June 12, 2018

New Zealand Political Landscape

Right now in NZ the two major parties, Labour and National, are pretty much locked in head-on battle. The landscape (for want of a better word) has returned to that which existed before the introduction of MMP (Mixed Member Proportional) in 1996.

In the early days of MMP smaller parties did have a much larger say. Examples are ACT (Association of Consumers and Taxpayers) and the Alliance (a left wing assemblage of New Labour, Mana Motuhake, Greens, Social Credit etc). Now there is no Alliance, and just the one ACT member of parliament.

Only two smaller parties figure these days; NZ First and Greens. Both hover around the 5% threshold. National are left stranded as they only have ACT as a natural fit.

Here's the deal, future governments in the very near future will be elected due to the strength of those smaller parties. It will be essential to have all their votes count. If the smaller parties currently in parliament fall below the 5% threshold their votes may be wasted. Seeing as all votes count once an electorate seat is won by that party, the sensible solution is to make deals, offering up winnable or safe seats to those potential partners. It means losing one or two electorates for the larger party but they have a chance of forming a government.

Think of it like this; if Labour are on 41% at the next election and their current coalition partners are on 4.5% each and they have no electorate seats, then the votes for those smaller partners don't count. But if Labour do deals, they can ensure all 9% that could be wasted fully counts, they get to 50% and form a government.

Consider the alternatives for either major party. If Labour do not play the game smart, they stand to watch National form a government with less than 50% of the vote if National end up the largest party. That's because all parliamentary seats must be allocated and are distributed amongst parties reaching the threshold. For its part National has to adjust and find a natural fit. One approach they could take given its much larger membership base, is start other brands, or possibly reverse takeover smaller parties.

How does this work? Well political parties must be democratic. The BlueGreens group within National could all join the Greens and take them over. Alternatively farmer groups within National could take over NZ First. National could do this quite easily if they had the will to do it. Whether they are organised or not however is another question. My thinking is the Greens would be easier to takeover.

We are in for some interesting manoeuvring.