Prince Archie

The below YouTube channel has an interesting theory, that the son of Prince Harry is not Meghan's child. She speculates that Harry got someone pregnant, and that the child is being brought up by the mother in England. This explains Harry turning up in the UK every now and again, without his wife or children. He's visiting his son.

She explains, this is why Meghan feels she's owed an apology; that's because she covered for her husband but has not been treated well in return. 

Personally, going by the evidence available to us, I don't believe there are any children at all. If we start right back at the beginning, Meghan's first pregnancy was dubious to say the least, and then the announcement of birth outside Buckingham Palace was not signed by witnesses. Contrast with the announcements of the births of Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis, for examples of what these announcements are meant to look like.

King Charles III Cancer

Buckingham Palace have announced that King Charles has cancer. A few days ago he went into hospital for a medical procedure due to his enlarged prostate, but they claim that during that visit another area of concern was discovered and this was not benign. Therefore, he is suspending all duties while he undergoes treatment (please see the announcement below).

Is anyone seeing a pattern here? An announcement is made that appears to be everyday, that later turns out to be much more serious. The Palace is gradually breaking the news to us.

Another recent case is that of Catherine, The Princess of Wales. The Palace announced she was admitted to the same hospital as Charles, in her case for abdominal surgery. But she was not seen arriving, nor leaving, and her family did not visit while she was said to be in the hospital. Where is she?

King Charles 2023 Christmas Message

What was that? I've just seen what I think is the worst Christmas message given by a reigning British Monarch. I'll have to see it again, but just off the top of my head after having sat through this nonsense:

Charles hardly ever mentioned the Commonwealth (I think I heard it said once). 

Did he mention his own family? They're probably there, I'll review but if you blinked you missed it. [Upon review, he never mentions any of his children or grandchildren by name, but he says the word family a couple of times and shows pictures of them doing stuff.]

I heard the word conflict once, genocide seems to be something you don't talk about these days. 

When it comes to religion, bear in mind this is a Christian festival, honouring the birth of Jesus. What I've just witnessed is a pseudo Christian message spliced with woke, the new religion worshipping the Earth. In this woke world we can be better people from within ourselves, forget about the will of God.

Charles never mentions his own journey, and of his relationship with God. That, I think, is the biggest omission, is Charles even Christian?

He's got to go, this is no King.

Prince Harry and Meghan Stepping Back

Thing is, you can't be a little bit royal. You're either part of the family firm or you aren't. It's about time Harry and Meghan made their minds up, in or out.

Note the reaction from Buckingham Palace to the recent announcement by the pair: https://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/118673807/prince-harry-and-meghan-stepping-back-as-senior-members-of-the-royal-family I like the phrase "these are complicated issues." That's an understatement if ever there was one. Here are a few issues;

Who is going to pick up the cost of security when in the US?

Is Harry actually resigning, he's still in the top 6, an important position within the line of succession. It's once out of the top 6 that things change. If he is resigning, does he keep his titles?

Financial independence: Harry inherited a small fortune from his mother Diana, why is he not already financially independent, he's had long enough to manage that much.

Does Harry know anything about living in the USA, can he even open a cheque account? Reports say he's going to be based in Canada, given their head of state is the Queen, doesn't this look a bit like remaining shackled to the Crown? Hmm?

Branding: will Meghan use her royal status to make money for herself. What are the boundaries, and if she does so, will she have to pay royalties to the Crown?

For their own explanation of what this 'new funding model' means, Harry and Meghan have launched a new website, read the relevant part here: https://sussexroyal.com/funding/

What do I think? It looks rather dodgy to me. Implied is that when they visit or cut a ribbon, they'll be attaching their invoice. That's quite improper and quite frankly, they shouldn't be able to maintain their status. They're simply becoming ordinary celebrities and that's all, just Harry and Meghan under this proposed 'structure.'

I also note they claim they're not currently funded by public money. Technically correct but that's not how the people see it, the Duchy of Cornwall, the Sovereign Grant etc from which the couple are funded, all of it is public money. My reaction to reading their website was 'get off the grass.'