I was right, the UK Covid Inquiry report says exactly what I predicted it would say; more lockdowns, sooner, harder. Authoritarians have to be ever more authoritarian.
There was no pandemic, it was the flu rebranded. The whole lockdown was designed to create fear and panic and to exert control. Likewise, the restrictions on travel, followed by the jab mandates were not about health, it was softening up for later more draconian measures, part of the global coup of 2020 and 2021.
Reports coming out always side with authority, they never side with the people. If such reports are critical, they always say how the authorities failed to be more authoritarian. They never side with freedom and relying on natural immunity.
Doubt what I'm saying? Head over to my useful links page, it is full of material you need to read. For instance, did you know that a study in Japan found that the more jabs you have the more likely you are to die? The control group is all those who received no jab, they're all doing well.
Once more, for those down the back of the room - there was no pandemic, you were hoodwinked, lied to, manipulated, extorted and ultimately experimented on, and they didn't care if they killed you. Who is they? Your government, that's who they are.
Oh, and if you're reading this, welcome, buy a lottery ticket as you're lucky; Google still scrubs any talk like this, it makes you wonder why they'd do that, eh, if I was the one talking nonsense.
The idea that a lockdown should not have happened in the circumstances was false, the authors said. Not having one would have caused loss of life “on a scale that was unconscionable and unacceptable”.
<snip>
If a lockdown had been imposed on 16 March, a week earlier than took place, modelling suggests this could have cut the number of deaths in England in the first wave of the virus by almost half, equating to 23,000 lives saved, the inquiry authors say.
